MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.KESAVANATHAN – Appellant
Versus
USHA 4 OTHERS – Respondent
1
O.P.No.163 of 2020
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,
This petition has been filed seeking probate of of a holograph Will
executed by K.Ramaswamy, father of the petitioner. K.Ramaswamy died on
13.08.2009. The Will which he had written is dated 02.07.2003.
2. The mother of the petitioner R.Rajalakshmi had died on
11.03.2013. The first, second and third respondents are the sisters of the
petitioner. The fourth and fifth respondents are the daughters of another
sister, who had predeceased, Vijayalakshmi.
3. It is informed that notice had been directed to all the respondents,
but they had taken a concious decision not to appear before this Court. They
were finally set ex-parte on 22.04.2022.
4. It must also be mentioned that the first respondent had filed a suit
for partition and separate possession of the same property and the said suit
had been transferred to the City Civil Court in view of the pecuniary
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
jurisdiction and renumbered as O.S.No. 7093 of 2019 now pending before
VII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. As plaintiff therein, the first
respondent herein had not appeared before the said Court and her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.