Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
DHILIPKUMAR S/o.Raghuraman – Appellant
Versus
Selisha @ Umamaheswari W/o.Dhilipkumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of revision petitions regarding domestic violence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against the domestic violence complaint concerning vagueness and malafide intentions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. context of residential accommodation and conditions proposed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal standing and necessity for trials regarding accusations. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court's consideration on the merits of allegations against family members. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
COMMON ORDER
The revision in CRP.No.1028 of 2025 has been filed by the mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the respondent in both these revisions, seeking to strike off the domestic violence complaint in DVC.No.17/2022 filed by the respondent against the respective petitioners. The revision in CRP.No.2273 of 2025 has been filed by the husband, challenging the orders passed in CMP.No.1567 of 2025 in DVC.No.17/2022, in and by which the Judicial Magistrate has allowed the residential petition filed by the wife.
2. I have heard Mr.P.V.Muralidharan, learned counsel for the petitioner in CRP.No.2273/2025 and MR.N.Palanikumar, learned counsel for the petitioner in CRP.No.1028/2025 and Mrs S. Bhargavi Gopalan, learned counsel for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
