SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66881

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
Kezhson I – Appellant
Versus
The Director of Town Panchay – Respondent


-

COMMON ORDER

By this common order, all these five Writ Petitions are being disposed of.

-

2. In these Writ Petitions, the Petitioner has challenged the Tender Summary Reports. By the impugned Tender Summary Reports, the Petitioner's bids, in respect of the tenders floated by the respective Town Panchayats, were rejected during the technical evaluation.

3. The details of the tender notifications, dates and reference numbers of the Impugned Tender Report, reasons for rejection of the bids, and the names of the persons to whom the contracts have been awarded are detailed below:-

Sl. NoW.P. (MD) No.Tender ID No.Impugned Tender Summary ReportReason for rejectionName of the successful bider
DateReference No.
120235/252025_DTP_567350_109.07.25165/2025/A1Sl.No.7, 8, 10, 12 properly not enclosedMJD Construction and Engineering Contractors P. Ltd
220236/252025_DTP_564565_109.07.2521-2025A1Sl.No.7, 8, 10, 12 - properly not enclosed-do-
320237/252025_DTP_564867_109.07.25188/2025/A1RejectS.Peter
420238/252025_DTP_565210_104.07.25274/2025/A1-1RejectMJD Construction and Engineering Contractors P. Ltd
520889/252025_DTP_565257_117.07.2590/2025A1Reject-do-

-

4. These tenders were floated by the following Pa
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top