SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66890


BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date of Reserved 07.08.2025 Date of Pronounced 26.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Crl.A(MD)No.1063 of 2024 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.13112 of 2024 Palraj : Appellant/Sole Accused . Vs.
The Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti Police Station, Dindigul District Crime No.109 of 2022 : Respondent/Complainant Prayer:-This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Spl.S.C.No.217 of 2023 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, 2012, Dindigul dated 23.01.2024 and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act is essential, but minor discrepancies do not invalidate credible evidence of possession and the conviction of accused.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)

(C), 25, and 29(1) - Conviction under NDPS Act for possession of 32 kg of ganja confirmed; appellants sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment and Rs.1,00,000/- fine - Compliance with Section 42 established, justifying search method - Evidence from witnesses credible and supported by material objects. (Paras 2, 4, 10, 15)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for possessing 32 kg of ganja after police received a tip-off and seized the contraband from a vehicle they were operating. The trial court found sufficient evidence linking the appellants to the contraband.

Findings of Court:
The court confirmed the conviction and sentence, finding no significant lapses in the prosecution's case and verified compliance with essential provisions of the NDPS Act.

Issues: Whether the search and seizure complied with legal requirements under the NDPS Act, including Sections 42 and 50, and if the prosecution proved possession beyond a reasonable doubt.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the sufficiency of compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, finding that the joint consent for searches and credible witness testimonies warranted conviction. Hence, the appellants failed to establish their defense, asserting the weight of contraband exceeded commercial limits.

Result: Appeals dismissed and trial court's judgment confirmed.

-

JUDGMENT

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.

This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, 2012, Dindigul in Spl.S.C.No.217 of 2023 dated 23.01.2024.

2. By the above judgment the trial Court had convicted the appellant and sentenced him, as detailed below:

Penal ProvisionsSentence of ImprisonmentFine Amount
366 of IPCThree years Rigorous ImprisonmentRs.5,000/- i/d to underg six months simple imprisonment
6 of the POCSO ActLife ImprisonmentRs.1,00,000/- i/d to undergo one year simple imprisonment
The sentences shall run concurrently

As far as compensation to the victim girl is concerned interim compensation amount of Rs. 2,00,000/ has been awarded to the victim girl as per rule 7 of the Compensation Scheme for Women Victim Survivors of Sexual Assault and other Crimes 2018 Scheme or as per Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme SW (5) (2) Department GO (MS).No.33 dated 03.10.2020 and the said compensation has to be paid to the victim girl by the Tamil Nadu Government within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

-

3. The case of prosecution is that on 01-05-2022 at 19.45 hours when P.W.14 was in the police station P.W 1 had given a complaint Ex.P1, stating that his minor daughter XXX studying 10th Standard in NPR Government High School had gone to the shop to buy paper at 09.00 am did not return home till 06.00 pm and that despite deligent search in the houses of relatives she was not found. He had thereby requested the police to find his missing daughter. Based on the complaint P.W.14 the Sub Inspector of Police registered a case in Crime No.109 of 2022 under “Girl Missing” and sent the First Information Report/Ex.P14 and the complaint to the Judicial Magistrate Court and other higher officials. Based on the same P.W.15 Sankareswaran, Inspector of Police took up the case for investigation registered by P.W.14 and went to the place of occurrence and in the presence of Suresh/P.W.4 and Chandraprakash and prepared Observation Mahazhar/Ex.P3 and Rough Sketch/Ex.P15. He then examined Eswaran/P.W.1, Tamil Selvi/P.W.3, Suresh/P.W.4, Chandraprakash and recorded their statements and sent the same to the Judicial Magistrate Court, Nilakottai. He then went in search of the missing victim, but he was unable to trace her. On 10.10.2022 at night, the victim was produced before the police station by her parents. Since it was late at night, the police asked her to come the next morning. On 11.10.2022, he examined the victim P.W.2, her mother P.W.3 and her father P.W.1 individually and recorded their statements. In that statement, the victim had stated about her love affair with the appellant and also the sexual assault. Thereafter, through the women police, the victim was sent to Dindigul Government Hospital for a medical check-up. On 11.10.2022, he altered the offence to Sections 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and filed an alteration report/Ex.P16. On 12.12.2022, the father of the victim filed a Habeas Corpus Petition before this Court in HCP(MD) No.15686 of 2022. In that petition, he filed a report about having sent the victim for medical examination. On 28.10.2022, since the offence had been altered to under the POCSO Act, the case was transferred to All Women Police Station, Nilakottai as per the direction of the Deputy Superintendent of Police. Thereafter, P.W.16 Baby, Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, while on duty, received the case records relating to Crime No. 109 of 2022 took up the case for further investigation and examined Eswaran, Tamil Selvi and the victim and recorded their statements. On 28.10.2022 at about 11.45 am, she arrested the appellant about 12.10pm and recorded the confession statement of the appellant in the presence of Suresh/P.W.4, Chandraprakash and obtained signatures from them. Thereafter, she sent the appellant for judicial custody. On 29.10.2022 at about 12.00 noon, she went to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top