SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67107

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S. RAMESH, J
STATE REPRESENTED BY – Appellant
Versus
TR.PALANIVEL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

The present appeal is one against acquittal. The State challenges the acquittal of the sole respondent in S.C.No.217 of 2009 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem dated 15.09.2020. The State wants to convict the respondent for the murder of two individuals, namely, Sundarajan and Kuppusamy.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the aforesaid two gentlemen were attacked, by as many as 24 persons, who constituted an unlawful assembly. The deceased were pelted with stones and beaten with sticks on 15.07.2003. The incident is said to have taken place at three locations, namely, (i) Veemanur Bus Stop, (ii) in front of Mariamman Temple and (iii) near one Anai Gounder's house.

The last two locations being at Pallikoodathanur.

3. According to the prosecution, the motive is twofold. First, that the first deceased i.e., Sundarajan and one Natesan were the members of a communist party. On account of differences, the deceased were excluded from the party. They, in turn, formed an association, which can be loosely termed as “Rajinikanth Fan's Association”. Under the banner of this association, they had c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top