SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAVI – Appellant
Versus
MRS.DEVI – Respondent
CRP 3399 2018



CRP.PD.No.3399 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

CRP (PD).No.3399 of 2018

and

CMP.No.19180 of 2020

Ravi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. Devi

2. R.Krishraghave

3. R.Lakshnasree

[2 and 3rd respondents are minor children represented

by her guardian mother Devi]

... Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order made in

I.A.No.177 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.4 of 2013 dated 26.06.2018 on the file

of the Subordinate Court, Tambaram.

For Petitioner

: Mr.V.Perarasu

For Respondents : Not Ready in Notice

(No Appearance)

1/5

http://www.judis.nic.in

CRP.PD.No.3399 of 2018

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition is filed as against the fair and decretal

order passed in I.A.No.177 of 2016 in H.M.O.P.No.4 of 2013 dated

26.06.2018 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram, thereby

ordering interim maintenance till the disposal of the divorce petition.

2. The petitioner is the husband and the first respondent is the wife.

They got married on 07.05.2009 and due to their wedlock they gave birth to

children viz., respondents 2 and 3. Due to misunderstanding between them,

they got separated and the petitioner filed a petition for divorce on the

ground of cruelty. While pending the divorce petition, the respondents

herein filed a petition under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

seeking interim maintenance for a sum of Rs.5,000/- to each of the

respondents herein.

3. On a perusal of the records, it reveals that the petitioner is working

as conductor in the Chennai Metro Transport Corporation and he is drawing

reasonable salary. The petitioner being the husband, he is duty bound to

2/5

http://www.judis.nic.in

CRP.PD.No.3399 of 2018

maintain his wife and children. Therefore, the Court below ordered only

Rs.10,000/- as interim maintenance for all the three respondents herein

commonly till the disposal of the main petition. Therefore, this Court finds

no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the Trial Court.

4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.

Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

20.07.2021

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Index : Yes/No

kv

To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Tambaram.

2. The Section Officer,

V.R. Section, High Court of Madras.

3/5

http://www.judis.nic.in

CRP.PD.No.3399 of 2018

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.

kv

CRP (PD).No.3399 of 2018

4/5

http://www.judis.nic.in

CRP.PD.No.3399 of 2018

20.07.2021

5/5

http://www.judis.nic.in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top