Sakthi Vinayaka Engineering Works – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary – Respondent
WP 12409/2021
['C PRAKASAM', 'M R GOKUL KRISHNAN GOVT ADVOCATE', '', 'RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN TAKES NOTICE', 'PVT NOTICE PERMITTED', 'PROOF NOT FILED']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P. No. 12409 of 2021
and
W.M.P. No. 19018 of 2021
Sakthi Vinayaka Engineering Works,
Represented by its Proprietor,
P.Loganathan, M/53,
S/o.Palanisamy Gounder,
No.1-A, Erode Road,
Vengamedu, Perundurai - 638 052,
Erode District.
...Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The Principal Secretary / Transport Commissioner,
Transport Department, Ezhilagam,
Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
2.The Regional Transport Officer,
Perundurai, Erode District.
3.The Senior Deputy Director and Head
Homologation, Management, Regulation
and Vehicle Evaluation,
P.M.Transport Bhawan North,
New Delhi.
...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of
Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to
register the trailers without insisting the petitioner to
produce Homologation Portal approval.
For Petitioner
:
Mr.C.Prakasam
For Respondents
: Mrs.Akila Rajendran
Government Advocate for R1&R2
Mr.Rajesh Vivekanthan for R3
O R D E R
The prayer sought for herein is for Writ of Mandamus
directing the first and second respondents to register the
trailers without insisting the petitioner to produce
Homologation Portal approval.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The petitioner is running a manufacturing unit for
manufacturing of trailers drawn by the agricultural tractors.
Previously, the Regional Transport Authorities after
registering the tractors, register the trailers by making
endorsement in the R.C. Book, after verification of the
parking brake system, whether fitted in the trailer or not.
3. However, the Government of India brought an amendment
in Rule, i.e., Central Motor Vehicles Rules in the year 2015,
that the details of every vehicle shall be put into web portal
after 2015. Even though, the said Rule has been kept in
abeyance, on the representation made by the tractor
manufacturers before the Government of India for certain
period, since they required to change over the mechanism in
the Tractor Hydraulics Braking System and to be extended for
the trailers, the said Amendment Rules came into force after
01.02.2016.
4. The Government of India also brought amendment in the
Rules, i.e., The Central Motor Vehicles Rules by issuing
notification, dated 15.06.2015.
5. In view of the aforestated amendments made in the
Rules, the agriculturalists who purchased the tractor trailer
approached the Regional Transport Officer concerned to get
registration along with the tractor, however they would insist
upon that, as per the amended rule, the trailer also should
get a Homologation Portal approval, without which, the trailer
concerned along with the tractor cannot be registered or
endorsement would not be made in the R.C.Book along with the
registration certificate of the tractor concerned.
6. When such a situation was faced by the petitioner, the
petitioner already approached this Court by filing a Writ
Petition in W.P. No. 1536 of 2021, where, the stand taken by
the respondent Transport Department was that, insofar as the
plea of the petitioner to register the trailer of the tractor
concerned, there can be no impediment for the Regional
Transport Officer concerned to register the same, provided
they must apply online for "R2" type trailer through
Homologation Portal approval and based on that, the respondent
will register the trailer.
7. Recording the same, a learned Judge of this Court, by
order dated 10.03.2021 disposed the said Writ Petition in W.P.
No. 1536 of 2021 by passing the following order:
"2. When the matter has been taken up for
hearing, Mr.Annai Ezhil, learned Government
Advocate appearing for the respondents would
submit that there is no impediment for the
resp