MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.Tamilarasan – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar – Respondent
WP 30979/2015
['M/S S R SHENBAGA BAABU', '', 'SARASWATHI MUTHIAH', 'A KUMAR SPL GP', '', 'R- THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE Ponneri Taluk Office', 'Ponneri', 'R- THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR', 'Thiruvallur District', 'Thiruvallur', 'M/S R MUNUSWAMY', 'V SURYA SANKAR', 'R LAVANYA']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED : 15.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.Nos.30979 of 2015, 1945 of 2016 and 2316 of 2016
and
M.P.Nos.1 & 3 of 2015, W.M.P.Nos.2022 & 2023 of 2016
and
W.M.P.No.25253 of 2017
W.P.No.30979 of 2015
M.Tamilarasan
...
Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The Tahsildar
Ponneri Taluk Office
Ponneri – 601 204.
2.Mrs.Konduru Shakila
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Ponneri Taluk Office,
Ponneri.
4.The District Collector,
Thiruvallur District,
Thiruvallur.
*R3 & R4 are impleaded as per
order dated 11.12.2015 by MMS3
in M.P.No.2 of 2015
..Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Prohibition
prohibiting the first respondent from initiating enquiry in
Na.Ka.No.11066/2015/A2 on his file till the disposal of the suit
initiated by the 2nd respondent in O.S.No.174 of 2014, 39/2015 on
the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ponneri.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
W.P.No.1945 of 2016
Konduru Shakila
..
Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Ponneri Revenue Division, Ponneri – 601 204
Tiruvallur District.
2. The Tahsildar
Ponneri Taluk Office
Ponneri – 601 204
Tiruvallur District.
3. M.Tamilarasan
...Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing
the 2nd respondent to pass final order in the enquiry held in
the representation of the petitioner dated 22.08.2015 for
restoration of patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of
the property being agricultural land comprised in Survey
NO.17/3B measuring extent of 0.69.0 Hectare (i.e) 1.71 Acres
situate at No.123 Kummanur Village, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur
District.
W.P.No.2316 of 2016
M.Tamilarasan
...
Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The District Collector
Thiruvallur District
Thiruvallur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Ponneri Taluk Office, Ponneri.
3. The Tahsildar
Ponneri Taluk Office, Ponneri.
4. Mrs.Konduru Shakila
..Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus calling for the records in respect of the impugned
proceedings of 2nd respondent vide 2nd Summon in Na.Ka. No.4287/
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2015/A1 dated 12.11.2015 and quash the same and may further
direct the 2nd respondent to issue the Final Report of 3rd
respondent vide Na.Ka. No.11006/ 2015/AA2 dated 5.10.2015.
For Petitioner in W.P.Nos.
30979/2015 & 2316/2016
:
Mrs.S.R.Shenbaga Babu
For Petitioner in W.P.No.
1945 of 2016
:
Mr.R.Munuswamy
For Respondents
:
Mr.R.Munuswamy
-for R2 in WP 30979/2015
Mrs.Akila Rajendran,
Government Counsel
for RR 1,3&4 in WP 30979/2015
and for RR 1 & 2 in WP 1945/2016 &
and for RR 1 to 3 in WP 2316/2016
Mrs.S.R.Shenbaga Babu for R3 in
W.P.No.1945 of 2016
Mr.R.Munusamy for R4 in
W.P.No.2316 of 2016
C O M M O N O R D E R
Since the facts projected by both sides in these writ
petitions are interconnected or overlapping and the parties to
all these writ petitions are one and the same, and the issue
raised in these writ petitions is also one and the same, which
relates to the patta issued in favour of the petitioner in
W.P.Nos.30979 of 2015 and 2316 of 2016, with the consent of the
learned counsel appearing for both sides, all the three writ
petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this
common order.
2. For the sake of brevity, the petitioner in W.P.No.1945
of 2016 viz., Konduru Shakila would be called as Shakila and the
petitioner in the other Writ Petitions in W.P.Nos.30979 of 2015
and 2316 of 2016 M.Tamilarasan would be called as Tamilarasan.
3.The necessary facts which are required to be noted for
the disposal of these three writ petitions are given below.
4. The agricultural property to