SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
THIRUNAVU @ THIRUNAVUKKARASU – Appellant
Versus
KARAPPAKA OM SAKTHI FINANCIERY – Respondent
SA 309/2002



Advocates:
['THIRUNAVU @THIRUNAVUKKARASU', '', 'APPELLANT', 'VIDE COURT ORDER DT', 'M/S V RAGHAVACHARI', '', 'V SRIMATHI', 'R - KARAPPAKA OM SAKTHI FINANCIERY REP BY ITS PARTNERS S ANNAMALAI AND OTHERS', 'R - TAPAL RETURNED WITH AN ENDORSEMENT WANT OF FRESH HEARING']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.07.2021

C O R A M

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

S.A.No.309 of 2002 &

CMP.No.2509/2002

Thirunavu @ Thirunavukkarasu

... Appellant

Vs.

1.Karapattu Om Sakthi Financiers

rep. By its partner S.Annamalai

2.A.Alagesan

3.K.Duraisami

4.C.Subramanian

5.V.Pichandi

6.V.Sekar

7.A.Sundarambal

8.Subramaniyam

9.Chandra ammal

10.Dhanabaggiam

... Respondents

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of

Civil Procedure against the Judgement and decree dated

30.11.2000 made in A.S.No.93 of 2000 on the file of the

Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai confirming the decree

and Judgement dated 30.04.1996 made in O.S.No.87 of 1990 on

the file of the Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.

For Appellant

: No appearance

For R1

: No appearance

For R2 to R6, R8 to R10 : Mr.V.Raghavachari

For R7

: Not ready in notice

O R D E R

On the last hearing date i.e. 29.06.2021, the learned

Counsel on record for the appellant reported no instructions

in this matter and therefore, this Court directed the Registry

to print the name of the appellant and post the matter for

hearing on 02.07.2021.

2. As directed by this Court, the name of the

appellant is printed in the cause list today (02.07.2021).

However, there is no representation on the side of the

appellant. The Second Appeal is of the year 2002. It can now

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

be inferred that the appellants is not interested in

prosecuting the Second Appeal.

3. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for

non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed, if any.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

ksa-2

To

1.The Principal District Court, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.

3. The Section Officer,

V.R. Section, High Court,

Madras.

+1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate, S.R.No. 30992

S.A.No.309 of 2002

GSM(CO)

GN(23/07/2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top