IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Special Original Jurisdiction )

Wednesday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

WPMP.No.34486 of 2005

IN WP.31459 of 2005

1 INDIAN BANK EMPLOYEES UNION

[ PETITIONERS ]

REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT, NO.25,

II LINE BEACH, CHENNAI-01

2 SHOBA MURALIDHARAN

Vs

1 INDIAN BANK REP.BY ITS

[ RESPONDENTS ]

MANAGING DIRECTOR, 66, RAJAJI SALAI,

CHENNAI-600 001

2 THE GENRAL MANAGER (HRM)

INDIAN BANK, HEAD OFFICER, 66, RAJAJI SALAI,

CHENNAI-600 001

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and

in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to

interims Stay of all further proceedings pursuant tot he order

No.PRNL/72/2005-06 dated 30.8.05 issued by the 2nd respondent

pending disposal of the WP.NO.31459/2005

Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon

perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof

and upon hearing the arguments of MR.V.GOVARDHANAN, for M/S.ROW AND

REDDY, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.RITA CHANDRASEKAR,

Learned Counsel of M/S.AIYAR AND DOLIA, Advocate for Respondents,

the court made the following order:-

Mr.V.Govardhanan, learned counsel of M/s.Row and Reddy (Law

Firm) on behalf of two petitioners/writ petitioners and Ms.Rita

Chandrasekar learned counsel of M/s.Aiyar and Dolia (Law Firm) on

behalf of respondents/respondents are before this Virtual Court.

2. Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of

separate proceedings made in main writ petition today which reads

as follows:

'Mr.V.Govardhanan, learned counsel of M/s.Row and Reddy (Law

Firm) on behalf of two writ petitioners and Ms.Rita Chandrasekar

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned counsel of M/s.Aiyar and Dolia (Law Firm) on behalf of both

the respondents are before this Virtual Court.

2. Learned counsel for respondents has refiled (email filed)

counter affidavit dated 23.04.2021 and hard copy of the same is

before this Court. Learned counsel for respondents says that the

pleadings are complete on the side of respondents and she is ready

to argue the writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for writ petitioners requests for a short

accommodation.

4. List under the same cause list caption 'FINAL HEARING

CASES' on 25.08.2021.'

3. From the above, it is clear that the hearing of main writ

petition is in the anvil and therefore, no useful purpose would be

served by keeping this stay petition pending at this distant point

of time.

4. Captioned writ petition is, therefore disposed of as closed

without expressing any opinion or view on merits of the matter,

leaving open all the questions to be agitated in the main writ

petition. There shall be no order as to costs.

-sd/-

11/08/2021

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. )

High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 MANAGING DIRECTOR

INDIAN BANK, 66, RAJAJI SALAI,

CHENNAI-600 001

2 THE GENRAL MANAGER (HRM)

INDIAN BANK, HEAD OFFICER,

66, RAJAJI SALAI,

CHENNAI-600 001

Order

in

WPMP.34486/2005

in

WP.31459/2005

Date :11/08/2021

From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified

copies of the Interim Orders in this format

DV(18/08/2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/