MADRAS HIGH COURT
ORRA TRADERS PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
LAWRENCE KULANDAI NATHAN – Respondent
CRP 1918 2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON: 17.06.2021
PRONOUNCED ON: 01.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P. (NPD) Nos. 1918 & 1919 of 2020
And
C.M.P.Nos. 11724 & 11725 of 2020
C.R.P. (NPD) No. 1918 of 2020:
Orra Traders Pvt. Limited.,
Represented by its Director Saptendra Behra
Office: Ploat No. 640, Krushnakutira
Friends Colony
Cuttack – 763001
Branch Office at Plot No. 77
Dr.Gurunathan Street, Paneer Nagar,
Mugappair East, Chennai – 600 037.
Office at Door No. 144/2
Purasawalkam High Road, Kellys
Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010
... Petitioner/Respondent/Appellant/Respondent
-Vs-
Lawrence Kulandai Nathan
No.6, Jalan 3/10 PersiaranTiga
Bandar BaruSelayang, 68100,
Bau Selangor, Kuala Kumpur,
Malaysia
... Respondent/Petitioner/Respondent/Petitioner
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu
2
Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960, against the fair and
decreetal order dated 23.01.2020 passed in M.P.No. 381 of 2018 in
R.C.A.No. 365 of 2018 by the learned IX Small Cause Court, Chennai.
C.R.P. (NPD) No. 1919 of 2020:
Orra Traders Pvt. Limited.,
Represented by its Director Saptendra Behra
Office: Plot No. 640, Krushnakutira
Friends Colony
Cuttack – 763001
Branch Office at Plot No. 77
Dr.Gurunathan Street, Paneer Nagar,
Mugappair East, Chennai – 600 037.
Office at Door No. 144/2
Purasawalkam High Road, Kellys
Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010
... Petitioner/Appellant/Respondent
-Vs-
Lawrence Kulandai Nathan
No.6, Jalan 3/10 PersiaranTiga
Bandar BaruSelayang, 68100,
Bau Selangor, Kuala Kumpur,
Malaysia
... Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu
Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960, against the fair and
3
decreetal order dated 3.03.2020 passed in R.C.A.No. 365 of 2018 by the
learned IX Small Cause Court, Chennai confirming the fair and decreetal
order passed in R.C.O.P.No. 448 of 2017 dated 14.02.2018 by the learned
XVI, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
***
For Petitioner in
both Cr.Ps.
:
Mr. Silambanan
Senior Counsel
For Respondent in
both Cr.Ps.
:
M/s. Rank Associates
COMMON ORDER
Both the above Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the tenant,
who had suffered an adverse order dated 23.01.2020 in M.P.No. 381 of 2019
in R.C.A.No. 365 of 2018 and a consequential order dated 03.03.2020 in
R.C.A.No. 365 of 2018.
2.
The petitioner and the respondent had entered into a registered
agreement of lease on 27.05.2014 with respect to the land and building
bearing Door No. 144/2, old Door Nos. 82, 144 and 144/1, Purasawalkam
High Road, Kellys, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 001, measuring about 1 ground
and 654 sq.ft., Purasawalkam Division, Perambur Taluk, Chennai – 600 001.
4
The petitioner was the lessee/tenant and the respondent was the
lessor/landlord. The lease was for commercial purpose. The period of lease
was 15 years. It had been agreed that there would be a lock in period of
three years. This would indicate that during that period of three years, the
lessor would be permitted unhindered right of lessee over the property under
lease. There was also an agreement with respect to renewal of the lease after
the period of 15 years. There was also a rent free period of 90 days / 3
months. This meant that the first rent would fall due on 10.09.2014. It had
been further provided that during the lock in period, the lease agreement
cannot be terminated and if either party seeks to terminate the agreement
within the lock in period, then compensation aggregating to the lease rent for
the number of unexpired month on the total lease term of 36 months shall be
paid. The rent was fixed at Rs.4,50,000/- per month. A security deposit of
Rs.45/- lakhs had been paid by the lessee to the lessor. It had also been
provided that the Lessor would not terminate the agreement so long as the
Lessee continues to pay the monthly rents without default. However, it had
al