SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Mrs.S.Shameem – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar – Respondent
WP 16934/2014



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.11.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

W.P.No.16934 of 2014

S.Shameem

...Petitioner

Vs

1.The Tahsildar,

Salem, Salem District.

2.The Village Administrative Officer,

Salem Town, Salem,

Salem District.

... Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing

respondents to effect mutation of record by name transfer on the

basis of the Petition dated 10.04.2014 in respect of the

Petitioner's property situate at Door No.4/880, New No.14/880,

Jallalkhan Road, Fort, Salem Town, Salem, comprised in Old

Survey No.880, Re-Survey T.S.No.53, Ward-G, Block No.15, without

any further delay and consequential direction to the respondents

to issue patta as asked for.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Jayachandran

For Respondents: Mr.C.Jayaprakash

Government Advocate

O R D E R

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to

direct the respondents to effect mutation of record by name

transfer on the basis of the Petition dated 10.04.2014 in

respect of the petitioner's property situate at Door No.4/880,

New No.14/880, Jallalkhan Road, Fort, Salem Town, Salem,

comprised in Old Survey No.880, Re-Survey T.S.No.53, Ward-G,

Block No.15, without any further delay and consequential

direction to the respondents to issue patta.

2.It is brought to the notice of this Court that partition

suit was instituted and preliminary decree was passed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of

the respondents made a submission that the parties have not

obtained final decree order for the purpose of effecting sub-

division and for grant of patta only after final decree sub-

divisions are to be made and thereafter, mutations are to be

effected in the revenue records.

4.The writ petition is pending for the past about 6 years,

if at all the civil dispute between the parties reached

finality, then either of the party is at liberty to submit a

fresh application before the 1st respondent / Tahsildar for the

purpose of effecting mutation in the revenue records.

5.During the pendency of the civil proceedings, the revenue

authorities cannot grant patta and effect mutation of record.

The dispute between the parties are to be resolved for the

purpose of grant of patta and effect mutation of record. At the

time of filing of the writ petition, the final decree

proceedings were pending.

6.This being the factum, the parties to the civil dispute

are at liberty to submit a fresh application after disposal of

the civil proceedings before the competent Court of law.

7.With these liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

vs

To

1.The Tahsildar,

Salem, Salem District.

2.The Village Administrative Officer,

Salem Town, Salem,

Salem District.

+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.NO. 58977

W.P.No.16934 of 2014

KSM(CO)

A.SK(30.11.2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top