MADRAS HIGH COURT
Tattva Home Healthcare Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mrs.Pooja Srinivasaraja, Founder One Life Charitable Trust, And Welfare Association – Respondent
OA 442/2021
['M/s Kria Law', '', 'M S BHARATH', 'R PARTHASARATHY', 'AKSHAYA P SACHIN']
O.A.Nos.442 to 444 of 2021
in
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.26 of 2021
O.A.Nos.442 to 444 of 2021
in
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.26 of 2021
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
O.A.No.442 of 2021:
This application has been filed praying to
grant an ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, their partners,
their employees, officers, servants, agents and all others acting for and on
their behalf from making, selling distributing, advertising, offering for sale
rendering any services, especially, including platform for getting help to a
person of need in the form of Psychiatrist Psychologist, Art Therapist,
Drama Therapist, Counsellor, Psycho Therapist, Hypno Therapist and
Social worker and in any other manner directly or indirectly dealing with
any services in the name of ONE LIFE or any other similar mark amounting
to an infringement of the applicant's registered trademarks Nos.2878728 and
3027829 in Classes 44 and 41 respectively.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
O.A.Nos.442 to 444 of 2021
in
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.26 of 2021
O.A.No.443 of 2021:
This application has been filed praying to
grant an ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, their partners,
their employees, officers, servants, agents and all others acting for and on
their behalf from making, selling distributing, advertising, offering for sale
and in any other manner, directly or indirectly dealing with any services
especially including platform for getting help to a person of need in the
form of Psychiatrist Psychologist, Art Therapist, Drama Therapist,
Counsellor, Psycho Therapist, Hypno Therapist and Social worker in the
name of ONE LIFE or any other similar mark amounting to passing off of
goods and services of the respondent as and for that of the applicant's mark
ONE LIFE.
O.A.No.444 of 2021:
This application has been filed praying to
grant an ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, their partners,
their employees, officers, servants, agents and all others acting for and on
their behalf from using the domains names www.onelifengo.com, or any
other similar domains and mobile applications and softwares bearing the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
O.A.Nos.442 to 444 of 2021
in
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.26 of 2021
mark ONELIFE in any language amounting to passing off of the products
and services of the respondent as and for that of the applicant's mark
ONELIFE.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the
respondent.
3.The case of the applicant is that in the year 2000, the applicant
company was incorporated and the trade mark “ONE LIFE” was registered
before the Trade Mark Registrar on 09.01.2015 for services falling under
Class 44, which includes therapy of all kinds. On 10.08.2015, for the same
trade mark “ONE LIFE”, registration was granted for services under Class
41. While so, it is contended by the applicant/plaintiff that the respondent,
which is the NGO, has adopted the same name of the plaintiff “ONE LIFE”
and also with domain name onelifengo.org. Alleging that use of the
trademark “ONELIFE” has part of their organisation carrying on cognate
activity, the applicant is put to irreparable injury and loss.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
O.A.Nos.442 to 444 of 2021
in
C.S.(Comm.Div.)No.26 of 2021
4.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/defendant has
filed a detailed counter wherein it has been stated that the respondent is a
Charitable Trust and they commenced their service in the year 2019. It
concentrates on mental health and mental well being of the people. The
founder of the NGO has been awarded with citations and appreciated for her
service. Since the activity of the applicant/plaintiff and the
respondent/defendant are different, there is no possibility of causing any
loss to reputation or income to the applicant. Further, it is contended that the
applicant/plaintiff is using the trade name of “ONE LIFE” as two words.
Whereas the re