MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.Paul Raj – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar – Respondent
WP 15193/2016
['M/S P SARAVANAN', '', 'T WILLSON EASTER RAJ', 'S P PARVADHRAJ ARUMUGAM', 'J YESOTHA SARAVANAN', 'GOVT ADVOCATE']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.11.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.15193 of 2016
&
W.M.P.Nos.13240 & 13241 of 2016
S.Paul Raj,
S/o P. Susai (Late)
E.B. Quarters Backside,
Salem Camp,
Mettur Taluk
Salem District
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Tahsildar
Mettur Taluk
Salem District
2. The District Collector,
Salem District.
... Respondents
(R2 Suo Motu impleaded Vide order dated 20.09.2021)
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, calling for the records from the Respondent's
proceedings vide order O.Mu.8147/14A5 dated 19.06.2015, and
quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to issue
the inter-caste marriage certificate to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan
For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash
Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner possesses the educational qualification
of Bachelor of Electrical & Electronics Engineering. The
petitioner belongs to Christian Adi-Dravida. The 1st
respondent has given a community certificate to the petitioner
as Backward Class as per G.O.Ms.1564, Social Welfare
Department dated 30.07.1985. The petitioner married one girl,
namely, G.Amutha, who studied up to Master of Physical
Education. She belongs to Hindu Arunthathiyar community. The
marriage between the petitioner and the said Amutha was
solemnized on 02.03.2009 at Thippi Reddy Thirumana Mandapam,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Kolathur Mettur (Taluk), Salem District. The wife of the
petitioner was given the Community Certificate as Scheduled
Caste as per SI.No.5 of SC/ST (Amendment) Act, 1976.
2. Under these circumstances, the petitioner relying
on G.O.Ms.No.188, Personnel and Administrative Reforms
(Personnel-P) Department dated 28.12.1976, has submitted an
application for grant of inter-caste marriage certificate for
the purpose of availing the benefits of priority in public
employments.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on
the said G.O.Ms.No.188 dated 28.12.1976 and contended that the
Government Order says that "Where one of the spouses belongs
to SC/ST, then inter-caste marriage certificate has to be
issued in favour of the petitioner”. In the present case, the
petitioner was issued with the community certificate as
'Backward Caste' and his wife was issued with the community
certificate as 'Scheduled Caste' and therefore, it is an
inter-caste marriage and accordingly, the petitioner is
entitled to get inter-caste marriage certificate for the
purpose of availing the benefits including priority in public
employment.
4. The learned Government Advocate contended that the
Government has issued clarification that conversion of
religion would not entail a person to get an inter-caste
marriage certificate.
5. In this regard, the clarification was issued by the
Government in letter No.235, Social Welfare Department dated
21.07.1997. As per the said clarification, change of religion
could not be a ground to grant inter-caste marriage
certificate. Relying on the said clarification letter, the
learned Government counsel reiterated that the case of the
petitioner was rightly rejected. Even in the impugned
order, it is stated that, as per the inquiry report received
from the Revenue Inspector, Mettur, the petitioner S.Paulraj
as well as his wife Smt.G.Amutha by birth belongs to Christian
Adi-Dravidar and Hindu Arunthathiyar community, respectively.
Therefore, the inter-caste marriage certificate cannot be
granted.
6. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Soosai
Etc. Vs. Union of India and others – 1986 AIR 733, delivered a
judgment on 30.09.1985 and made an observation that "The
expression Scheduled Caste is defined