R.VINOTHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS – Respondent
CRL OP 239/2019
['M/S C PRABAKARAN', '', 'M VINOTH', 'R PARTHIBAN', 'D KUMARI', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR TAKES NOTICE', '', 'G ARULSELVI', 'G CHANDRASEKARAN', 'COMPROMISE MEMO FILED', 'M/S T KARUNAKARAN']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.01.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl. OP No.239 of 2019
and Crl MP Nos.131 & 134 of 2019
1. R.Vinothkumar
2. Vellaiyammal
3. Satheesh
4. S.Rajendran
5. R.Jeevajothi
6. Mani
7. Iyar
... Petitioners
vs.
1. The State Rep.by
Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Sooramangalam, Salem
Cr. No11 of 2018
2. M.Pushpa
... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for records relating to
CC.No.110 of 2018 on the file of learned Additional Mahila Court
(Magisterial Level), Salem and to quash the same.
For Petitioners
: Mr. C.Prabakaran
For Respondents
: Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz,
Additional Public Prosecutor,
for R1
Mr. T.Karunakaran, for R2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
O R D E R
The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for
the records of the C.C.No.110 of 2018 pending on the file of the
learned Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Salem.
2. The case is still at the stage of Trial. By passage of
time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and
compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.
3. The consent affidavit dated 08.01.2021 has been filed by
the 2nd respondent/de-facto complainant before this Court. The
petitioners and the second respondent were also present through
Video conferencing and they were identified by Ms.Valarmathi,
Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sooramangalam,
Salem. In the affidavit it has been stated that the
petitioners and the second respondent have entered into a
compromise and amicably settled their issues in C.C.No.110 of
2018. This Court also enquired both the parties and was
satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement
between themselves.
4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be
served in keeping the case pending, even though, the offences
involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the
guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9
SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath),
and after exercising due caution as advised by the Hon'ble
Suprme Court in The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and
Another reported in (2019) 2 MLJ Crl 10, this Court in exercise
of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the case
in C.C.No.110 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned
Additional Mahila Court, (Magisterial Level), Salem.
5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a
sequel, the proceedings in C.C.No.110 of 2018, pending on the
file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, (Magisterial
Level), Salem, is quashed and the terms of affidavit shall form
part and parcel of this order. The petitioners shall pay a sum
of Rs.2000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) as costs, to the credit
of the President, Tamil Nadu Advocates Clerk Association, Madras
High Court, Chennai (Indian Bank, High Court Branch, A/c
No.484026006, IFSC Code:IDIB000M157), within a period of one
week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file
a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
compliance in the Registry. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
jv
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Sooramangalam, Salem
2. The Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level),
Salem.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras,
Chennai 600 104.
4 The President,
Tamil Nadu Advocates Clerk Association,
Madras Highcourt, Chennai
Copy to
5. The Section Officer,
Criminal Section, Highcourt,
Madras.
+1cc