2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 87351
MADRAS HIGH COURT
MIR ANAS ALI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS – Respondent
CRL A 1232/2022
['M/S J RAVIKUMAR', '', 'R NAVEEN SRINIVASAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
CRL.A.No.1232 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 20.12.2022
PRONOUNCED ON : 23.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH
AND
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
CRL.A.No.1232 of 2022
Mir Anas Ali
.. Appellant
Vs.
State rep. by
The Inspector of Police
Ambur Town Police Station
Thirupathur District
Cr.No.193/2022
.. Respondent
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 21(1) of the National
Investigation Agency, Act, 2008, to set aside the order dated 16.11.2022
passed by the Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ambur,
in Crl..M.P.No.4096 of 2022.
For Appellant
Mr.J.Ravikumar
For Respondent Mr.R.Muniyapparaj
Additional Public Prosecutor
1/20
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.A.No.1232 of 2022
J U D G M E N T
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the order dated
16.11.2022 passed by the Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial
Magistrate, Ambur, in Crl..M.P.No.4096 of 2022.
2. The minimum facts that are required to decide this criminal appeal
are as under :
2.1. Based on a complaint given by one Thangavel, Special
Sub-Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, a case in Ambur Town
P.S. Crime No.193 of 2022 was registered on 30.07.2022 for the offences
under Sections 121, 122 and 125 IPC and Sections 18, 18-A, 20, 38 and 39
of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (in short “the UAP Act”)
by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambur Sub-Division.
2.2. The complaint discloses that during discreet enquiries conducted
by the special branch, an information was received that one Mir Anas Ali
2/20
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.A.No.1232 of 2022
(appellant herein), S/o.Mir Hidayath Ali, had joined Islamic State of Iraq
and Syria (ISIS) and was propagating its ideologies and policies actively in
the social media. Therefore, the said Mir Anas Ali was arrested by the
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ambur Sub-Division, on 30.07.2022, for
the offences disclosed in the FIR and was produced before the learned
Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Ambur (for brevity
“the Magistrate”) on 30.07.2022, who remanded him in judicial custody for
15 days.
2.3. The investigation was continued by the Deputy Superintendent of
Police, Ambur Sub-Division and it is reported that the appellant was being
periodically produced before the Magistrate Court, every 15 days for
extension of judicial remand. While that being so, the appellant filed a bail
petition in Crl.M.P.No.2501 of 2022 in the Court of the Principal District
and Sessions Judge, Vellore (for brevity “the Sessions Judge”), which was
dismissed on merits on 01.09.2022.
3/20
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL.A.No.1232 of 2022
2.4. Thereafter, the appellant sent a representation from prison to the
Court, stating that he does not have the means to engage an Advocate and
prayed for his release on bail. Based on this representation that was
forwarded to the District Legal Services Authority, a counsel by name
Mr.N.Anbarasan (Enrolment No.4142/2012) was nominated to file a bail
petition for the appellant. Accordingly, a second bail petition was filed in
Crl.M.P.No.3295 of 2022, in which, after hearing both sides, the learned
Sessions Judge, by order dated 15.10.2022, released the appellant on bail,
without adverting to Section 43D of the UAP Act, treating this case as an
another run-of-the-mill bail petition.
2.5. Realising the seriousness of the case, the prosecution filed a
petition on 17.10.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.3427 of 2022 in Crl.M.P.No.3295 of
2022 to cancel the bail under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. in the Sessions Court.
Since the prosecution had moved the petition for cancellation of bail, the
sureties that were offered by the appellant were not accepted and therefore,
he continued to be in incarceration.
4/20
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judi