2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 70964
MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.Girija – Appellant
Versus
No Respondent – Respondent
OP 574/2022
['M/s S RAMESH KUMAR', '', 'M Mayadevi', 'L Sweety', 'S Aravind Raj', 'A Vinu Pradha']
1
O.P.No.574 of 2022
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
This original petition has been filed taking advantage of Sections 3, 7,
8, 9, 10 & 29 of the Guardians and Ward Act, 1890 read with Order XXI
Rules 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules of Madras High Court, by the
paternal grandmother of K.Mithraa, who was born on 26.11.2011. The
parents of the minor child, M.Karthikeyan and Lakshmi Priya and also the
elder sister K.Hasini all died in a motor accident accident on 23.05.2022.
The petitioner is the only surviving heir with a right to look after the minor
child.
2.In her chief, the petitioner also specifically stated that the father of
her daughter-in-law, Nandakumar died due to liver disease, when her
daughter-in-law was nearly about 12 or 13 years and her mother, Manjula
died in the car accident along with her daughter.
3.In the petition, she had stated that she is in good circumstances,
having a family income of Rs.3,00,000/- and had undertaken to act as
guardian of the minor child and had also stated that she does not have any
adverse interest as against the minor child.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
4.The petitioner was invited to adduce evidence and accordingly she
examined herself as PW-1. She filed her proof affidavit. The death
certificates of her son M.Karthikeyan and daughter-in-law, Lakshmi Priya
were marked as Exs.P1 and P2 respectively. The death certificate of her
another grand daughter, Hasini was marked as Ex.P3. The legal heirship
certificate of M.Karthikeyan was marked as Ex.P4. The birth certificate of
the minor child K.Mithraa for whom guardianship is now sought was marked
as Ex.P5. Ex.P6 is the copy of the Sale Deed dated 04.09.2020 of a property
purchased by M.Karthikeyan, the son of the petitioner, which property is
situated at Thirunavukarasu Nagar, Gidangal, Tindivanam in S.Nos.298/2
and 298/1. They are plots of land. It would only be advisable that the
petitioner manages the said property to the advantage of the minor and if
ever any necessity arises to deal with the property, she cannot do so, except
with specific permission from either of this Court or the District Court,
Villupuram. The petitioner had also filed declaration of willingness to accept
the office of grant of the person and property of minor K.Mithraa. That
declaration was marked as Ex.P12.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3
5.In view of the evidence adduced, this Original Petition stands
allowed. The petitioner is appointed as the guardian of the property and
personal effects of the minor K.Mithraa who was born on 26.02.2011. The
petitioner is also directed to have custody of the child and retain such
custody.
09.11.2022
smv
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
smv
O.P.No.574 of 2022
09.11.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis