2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 98050
MADRAS HIGH COURT
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
January Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.702
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirty First day
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirty First day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.702 of 2022
K.ZAKIR HUSSAIN
[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY
[ RESPONDENT ]
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
SPE, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
ACB, CHENNAI.
For Petitioner : M/S.S.KAMALAKANNAN, Advocate for
M/S JAYASUDHA Advocate
For Respondent : MR.K.SRINIVASAN, Special Public Prosecutor
for CBI-cases
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody
on 20.09.2021 for the offences under Sections 120(B), 419, 420, 409,
467, 468, 471 of IPC and under Sections 3(1)(a) read with 13(2) of
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) in Crime
No.RC0322020A0006/CBI/ACB, on the file of the respondent police, seeks
bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/A11 along
with other accused committed impersonation, fraud, forgery and
cheating in Term deposits and Current Account standing in the name of
M/s. Chennai Port Trust in the Koyambedu Branch of Indian Bank,
Chennai, and thereby, caused wrongful loss to public money to the
extent of Rs.45 Crores approximately and corresponding wrongful gain
to the perpetrators themselves. Hence the complaint.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in
this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was made to
believe that the transaction was that of trading and may be paid back
over a period of time and that he was not aware of the fact that the
current account No.6867825525 in the name of the Chennai Port Trust-
General Insurance Fund itself was a forged account, created with
fabricated documents through impersonation as alleged and without
knowing the fact, the petitioner shared account details of 7
individual persons. He would further submit that a sum of Rs.5 Crores
and 11 lakhs in aggregate was credited to 7 different accounts
referred by the petitioner and the money was withdrawn and paid in
cash to one Sudalaimuthu after deducting the aggregate commission
amount of 7% which includes 2% that of petitioner's commission and
that the petitioner received a sum of Rs.11 lakhs approximately in the
entire transaction as commission. He would further submit that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on wrong surmises
and he has been suffering incarceration for more than 4 months from
20.09.2021 with severe diabetic ailments and that he is ready to abide
by any conditions imposed by this court. Hence, he would pray for
grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI filed counter
and submitted that during the course of investigation, it has been
revealed from the statements of the first link beneficiaries namely
1.Shri Mohammed Shaik, 2.Shri Sappanimuthu 3.Shri Selvam and
4.Shri.Praveen 5.Shri.S.H.Noor Mohamed and the mediators namely
1.Shri.Guru Jessy 2.Shri. Aravind Raj Taiak 3.Shri Seenikutty and
Smt.Rani who collected the details of Bank accounts of the first link
beneficiaries and given to the petitioner/accused Zakir Hussain (A-11)
and his son Halid Batch. It is further submitted that the fund of
Chennai Port Trust was credited from the purported current account in
the name of Chennai Port Trust General Insurance Fund and the same was
credited into the account of aforesaid first link beneficiaries and
after the same were withdrawn/transfered by the first link
beneficiaries and handed over the withdrawal amount to the
petitioner/accused na