SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65696

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice A.A.NAKKIRAN
A.Ansar Ahamed and another – Appellant
Versus
C.Kumaran and another – Respondent
A/1317/2022



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION)

MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2022

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

A.No.1317 of 2022

in

T.O.S.No.4 of 2009

In the matter of the Indian

Succession Act XXXIX of

1925;

and

In the matter of the Last Will

and Testament of Saraswathi-

Deceased.

C.KUMARAN,

S/O.LATE G.CHANDRAN,

OLD NO.6, NEW NO.9,

H.D.RAJA NAGAR,

TEYNAMPET,

CHENNAI - 600 018

..PETITIONER

-Vs-

1. NITHYA @ SEETHA,

*

REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN MR.PRAKASH,

* DEFENDANT DECLARED AS MAJOR

AMENDED AS PER ORDER IN A.NO.6597/10

DATED 13/10/2017 BY

HON'BLE JUSTICE

C.V.KARHIKEYAN

NO.40, CANAL ROAD,

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2

KOYAMBEDU,

CHENNAI – 600 107

..CAVEATOR/DEFENDANT

A.No.1317/2022:

1. MR.A.ANSAR AHAMED,

S/o.Abdul Rahim,

New No.17, Old No.9,

H.D.Raja Street, Eldams Road,

Teynampet,

Chennai - 600 018.

2. MR.A.JAKIR AHAMED

S/o.Abdul Rahim.

New No.17, Old No.9,

H.D.Raja Street, Eldams Road,

Teynampet,

Chennai - 600 018.

..Applicants/Proposed Defendant2 and 3

-Vs-

1. MR.C.KUMARAN,

S/o.Late G.Chandran,

No.D/34, Nakeerar Nagar,

Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

..1st Respondent/Plaintiff

2. G.NITHYA ALIAS SEETHA

W/o.Justin K. John Mathew,

No.3, Plot No.22A, Bharathi Nagar,

2nd Cross Street,

Pillayar Koil Street,

Ponniamman Koil, Sholinganallur,

Chennai 600 119.

..2nd Respondent/Defendant

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pleased to

implead the applicants as defendants 2 and 3 in T.O.S.No.4 of 2009.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3

This application coming on this day before this Court for hearing the

court made the following order:

The learned Counsel for the applicants/proposed defendants 2 & 3

seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the application and he has also

made an endorsement to that effect.

2.

In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the

learned counsel for the applicants, this application is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Sd/-A.A.N.J.

27.06.2022

//Certified to be a true copy//

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

SU./04.07.2022 COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the

Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top