2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 101436
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dvara solutions Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chairperson – Respondent
WP 18925/2022
['Pawan jhabakh', '', 'C Kaveen', 'Salai Varun', 'PROOF NOT FILED']
W.P. No. 18925 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.10.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 18925 of 2022
and
W.M.P. No. 18262 of 2022
Dvara Solutions Private Limited,
10th Floor, Phase 1, IIT-Madras Research Park,
Kanagam Village,
Taramani,
Chennai – 600 113,
Tamil Nadu.
… Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Chairperson,
Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Chennai/
Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce,
Guindy,
Chennai – 600 032.
2. Sambandh Finserve Private Limited,
Represented by its Authorised Signatory,
Plot No. O-4/9, Civil Township, PS,
Raghunathpalli,
Roukerla,
Sundargarh – 769 004.
... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950,
praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the
First Respondent contained in order dated 27.08.2021 in MSEFC/CR/57/2021
Online Application No. TN02E0164019/S/00001, quash the same as arbitrary,
unjust and illegal and consequently direct the First Respondent to hear and
decide the Online Application No. TN02E0164019/ S/00001 on merits.
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No. 18925 of 2022
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Pawan Jhabakh
For Respondents
:
Mr. L.S.M.Hasan Fizal,
Additional Government Pleader (for R1)
No appearance (for R2)
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Pawan Jhabakh, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and
Mr. L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for
the First Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the
pleadings of the parties.
2.
Though the Second Respondent has been served, it has not entered
appearance either in person or through counsel.
3.
The Petitioner had made a claim in Case No. MSEFC/CR/57/2021 under
Section 18(1) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act,
2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'the MSMED Act' for short) claiming payment of
Rs. 87,47,316/- along with interest from the Second Respondent towards
remaining amount due for goods supplied with interest calculated in terms of
that Act, in which an Order in No. MSEFC/CR/57/2021 dated 27.08.2021 was
passed holding that it did not have territorial jurisdiction in the matter as the
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No. 18925 of 2022
invoice has been raised in Bangalore, which is impeached in this Writ Petition.
4.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner contends that inasmuch as the office of
the Petitioner is located at Chennai, the First Respondent has territorial
jurisdiction to entertain the matter, but on account of technical glitches, the
Petitioner could not join during video-conferencing to properly explain the same
to the First Respondent. It is fervently pleaded that in such circumstances, the
impugned order may be set aside and the Petitioner may be afforded an
opportunity of hearing before the First Respondent as the restrictions for COVID
have been subsequently lifted.
5.
Having due regard to the circumstances explained by the Petitioner for
inability to effectually represent its case during the COVID pandemic before the
First Respondent, this Court, without expressing any view on the correctness or
otherwise of the the impugned Order No. MSEFC/CR/57/2021 dated 27.08.2021
passed by the First Respondent, is inclined to set aside the same and remit the
matter back to be decided afresh by the First Respondent following the
prescribed procedure in accordance with law.
6.
In such circumstances, the claim made by the Petitioner is restored to the
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No. 18925 of 2022
file of the First Respondent, who shall list the matter for next hearing on
07.12.2022 after issuing due notice to the Petitioner and the Second Respondent
in that regard and if the First Respondent is not able then