2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 89883
W.P.No.7429 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.7429 of 2018
and
W.M.P.No.9225 of 2018
K.Kala
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Secretary,
Educational Department,
Secretariat,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Secretary,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Public Department,
Secretariat,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
3.The Chief Educational Officer,
Department of School Education,
Peyton Road,
Ooty,
Nilgiris District.
4.Robert
Page 1 of 15
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7429 of 2018
5.The Station House Officer or the Inspector (In-charge),
Devala Police Station,
Gudalur,
Nilgiris District.
6.The Revenue Divisional Officer / Executive Magistrate,
Udhagamandalam,
Nilgiris District.
7.Mr.K.Pichaiyappan,
The then Chief Educational Officer,
Udhagamandalam,
Nilgiris District.
... Respondents
[R5 to R7 suo-motu impleaded vide order
dated 02.08.2022 in W.P.No.7429 of 2018]
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to initiate
disciplinary action against the 4th respondent and consequently direct the 1st
and 2nd respondents to pay a sum of Rs.1000000 (Ten Lakhs) compensation
to the petitioner.
For Petitioner
: Ms.M.Sreela
For Mr.R.Diwakaran
For R1 & R3
: Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru
Special Government Pleader
For R2 & R5
: Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari
Government Advocate
For R4
: Dr.G.Babu
For R6
: Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja
Government Advocate
Page 2 of 15
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7429 of 2018
O R D E R
The Writ of Mandamus has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to
initiate disciplinary action against the 4th respondent and consequently,
direct the respondents 1 and 2 respondents to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-
(Rupees Ten Lakhs) compensation to the writ petitioner.
2. The petitioner states that herself and her husband are daily wage
workers and she has two daughters and one son. Her son Yuvaraj, aged
about 17 years was studying in Gudalur Government Higher Secondary
School in 12th Standard. Her son was tortured and harassed by the School
Headmaster / 4th respondent. The 4th respondent used to cut the hair of the
boys in public, tear the trousers of her son and other boys by using the blade
and beat the children ruthlessly and abuse them using filthy language. The
petitioner states that her son was also subjected to such ill-treatment and on
account of such continuous behaviour of the 4th respondent, the son of the
petitioner committed suicide.
3. The petitioner has narrated various incidents in the affidavit filed in
support of the writ petition to establish that the 4th respondent has harassed
Page 3 of 15
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.7429 of 2018
the students studying in the School. The other students informed the
petitioner that the Headmaster used to humiliate all the children and kept
torturing the children inside the School. In respect of the suicide of the son
of the petitioner, the Police registered a case in Crime No.533 of 2017 on
30.08.2017 under Section 174 Cr.P.C.
4. The grievance of the petitioner was that the Police had not
proceeded with the investigation. No enquiry was conducted properly. The
4th respondent continued his activities in the school. Thus, the petitioner is
constrained to move the present writ petition.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that the 4th
respondent has committed an act of violation of the Right to Life of the son
of the petitioner, who had committed suicide. The Right of Children even
under the United Nations Conventions on Right to Child (UNCRC) has to be
protected and if the 4th respondent is allowed to continue such activities, it
would cause irreparable loss to the students community and therefore,
appropriate a