2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72473
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Sulaiman – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Registrar – Respondent
WP 915/2022
['R MANICKAVEL', '', 'Anusuya Balaji', 'S POOVENDHAN-MS', 'A Ramakrishnan', 'M C S Sindhu']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.915 of 2022
Sulaiman
...Petitioner
-Vs-
1. The Sub Registrar,
Sub Registrar Office,
Purasasiwalkam, Chennai.
2. The Inspector General of Registration,
Santhome High Road,
Chennai - 600 028.
...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the
impugned order "Refusal Check Slip", dated 05.01.2022 in
Ref.No.RFL/Purasaiwalkam/1/2022 passed by the first respondent
relating to the General Power of Attorney in respect of the
property bearing Door No.4 and 5, Erukkanchery High Road,
Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 600 039, comprised in R.S.No.537/1, as per
patta 537/8 and 537/9 Block No.27 of Perambur Village, Perambur
Taluk, measuring 302 sq.ft., executed by Rahimunisha Begum by
quashing the same and further directing the first respondent to
receive the General Power of Attorney dated 05.01.2022 and
register the same in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Manickavel
For Respondents: Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ
of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to
the impugned order "Refusal Check Slip", dated 05.01.2022 in
Ref.No.RFL/Purasaiwalkam/1/2022 passed by the first respondent
relating to the General Power of Attorney in respect of the
property bearing Door No.4 and 5, Erukkanchery High Road,
Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 600 039, comprised in R.S.No.537/1, as per
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
patta 537/8 and 537/9 Block No.27 of Perambur Village, Perambur
Taluk, measuring 302 sq.ft., executed by Rahimunisha Begum by
quashing the same and further directing the first respondent to
receive the General Power of Attorney dated 05.01.2022 and
register the same in accordance with law.
2.Heard Mr.R.Manickavel, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, learned Special Government
Pleader appearing for the respondents.
3.The property comprised in R.S.No.537/1, situated at Block
No.27 of Perambur Village, Perambur Taluk, ad-measuring 604
sq.ft, bearing Door No.4 and 5, Erukkanchery High Road,
Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 600 039, belong to one Rahimunisha Begum
and her late husband Ghoush Basha. They purchased the said
property by the registered sale deed, dated 06.02.2009
registered vide Document No.393 of 2009. The said Ghoush Basha
gifted his half share by way of Hiba in favour of his wife
Rahimunisha Begum and by the Hiba deed, dated 13.04.2016. Thus,
the said Rahimunisha Begum became the absolute owner of the
entire property.
4.Thereafter, the said Rahimunisha Begum executed a Power
of Attorney in favour of the petitioner to deal with the
property, dated 23.09.2002. The said Power of Attorney has been
presented for registration on 05.01.2022 before the first
respondent. However, the first respondent refused to register
the same by the impugned check slip, dated 05.01.2022 for the
reason that as per the Gift deed executed through Hiba is
unregistered one. It is a settled law that the provisions of
the Transfer of Property Act under Section 122 to 129 of Chapter
VII shall not be applicable to Muhammadan Law. The provisions
under Section 123 makes it clear that a deed of gift executed by
a donor in favour of donnee shall be compulsorily registered,
but Section 123 shall not apply if the parties to the
transaction of a gift are Muslims.
5.In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner
relied upon the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India
reported in 2001 (5) SCC 654 in the case of "Hafeeza Bib