COMMON ORDER

Aggrieved by an order dismissing the applications to reopen the case and to recall P.W.1, the plaintiff has come by way of these Revision Petitions.

2. The petitioner filed a suit for declaration and injunction in O.S.No.281 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate No.1, Hosur. In this case, admittedly, the trial was over and the matter was posted for arguments on 01.07.2015. At that stage, the plaintiff/revision petitioner filed two applications in I.A.Nos.618 & 619 of 2015 to reopen and to recall P.W.1. In support of these applications, the plaintiff had filed an affidavit, wherein it was stated that defendants had examined one Subbamma as D.W.2 and she had deposed that she sold the suit property bearing S.No.759/3 to the father of the defendants. According to the revision petitioner, the said Subbamma had no title to convey the property in S.No.759/3, therefore in order to prove that, the plaintiff wanted to produce certain documents and for that purpose, the plaintiff sought for reopen and recall of P.W.1.

3. The said applications were opposed by the respondents by filing counter, wherein they had stated that the suit was posted for arguments