MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
2021 and Crl.M.P.Nos.14161, 14162, 14165 & 14166
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.01.2022 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.Nos.25571, 25574, 25576 & 25579
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT - SECTION 148(2) - INTERPRETATION - COURT ANALYSIS - EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEPOSIT
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and filed an appeal against the conviction. The lower court, while suspending the sentence, directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount within one month. The petitioner challenged this order, arguing that it violated the statutory period of two months provided under Section 148(2) of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the lower court's order was in violation of the statutory period of two months provided under Section 148(2) of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act. The court further held that the petitioner was entitled to an extension of time of thirty days on sufficient cause being shown.
Issues: Whether the lower court's order was in violation of the statutory period of two months provided under Section 148(2) of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 148(2) of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, which provides that the amount referred to in sub-section (1) shall be deposited within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the appellant.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the criminal original petitions and directed the petitioner to deposit the 20% of the compensation amount within two months from the date of the order.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
CRL.O.P.Nos.25571, 25574, 25576 & 25579 of 2021
and
Crl.M.P.Nos.14161, 14162, 14165 & 14166 of 2021
Rupa.R
...Petitioner in all Crl.O.Ps
Vs
M/s.Sree Gokulam Chit &
Finance Co (Pvt) Ltd.,
Represented by its Manager/Authorized Officer,
A.Selvaraj,
No.66, Old No.356, Arcot road,
Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024.
...Respondent in all Crl.O.Ps
COMMON PRAYER: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section
482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order
passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.4732, 4735, 4734 & 4733 of 2021 in
Crl.Appeal Nos.76, 79, 78 & 77 of 2021 respectively, vide
order dated on 07.12.2021 on the file of Principal District
Judge, Thiruvallur now transferred and pending before III
Additional District & Sessions Judge, Poonamallee, and grant
the petitioner herein the Statutory period for deposit as per
Sec.148(2) of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act,
2018.
In all Crl.O.Ps
For Petitioner
:
Mr.L.K.Manjunath
in all Crl.O.Ps
COMMON ORDER
These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to set
aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.4732, 4735, 4734 & 4733
of 2021 in Crl.Appeal Nos.76, 79, 78 & 77 of 2021
respectively, vide order dated 07.12.2021, on the file of
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvallur, now
transferred and pending before III Additional District &
Sessions Judge, Poonamallee, and grant the petitioner herein
the Statutory period for deposit as per section 148(2) of the
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2018.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner
who is the accused under Section 138 N.I. Act against the case
filed by the respondent in STC Nos.210, 213, 212 & 211 of
2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track
Court, (Magistrate Level), Ambattur, was convicted by the
trial Court, by judgment dated 29.09.2021, against which, the
petitioner had filed appeals in Crl.Appeal Nos.76, 79, 78 & 77
of 2021 and filed suspension of sentence petitions in
Crl.M.P.Nos.4732, 4735, 4734 & 4733 of 2021. The lower Court,
by order dated 07.12.2021, in Crl.M.P.Nos.4732, 4735, 4734 &
4733 of 2021, suspended the sentence of the petitioner with a
condition that the petitioner to deposit the 20% of the
compensation amount before the trial Court to the credit of
STC Nos.210, 213, 212 & 211 of 2016, respectively, within a
period of one month. The contention of the petitioner is that
this is in violation of the statutory period of two months
provided under Section 148 (2) of the Negotiable Instruments
(Amendment) Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner may be given the statutory period
and also the extended period to deposit the 20% of the
compensation amount. The learned counsel for the petitioner
further submits that the petitioner, who is a Home maker, has
become victim due to the family circumstances and the
condition is an onerous one and it would not be possible for
her to mobilise such huge amount.
3. For the purpose of clarity, Section 148(2) of the
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act is extracted hereunder:
'148. (2) The amount referred to in
sub-section (1) shall be deposited within
sixty days from the date of the order, or
within such further period not exceeding
thirty days as may be directed by the Court
on sufficient cause being shown by the
appellant'.
It is seen that as per Section 148(2) of the Negotiable
Instruments (Amendment) Act, sixty days time limit is given.
Further, it can be extended by thirty days on sufficient cause
being shown. In view of the same, the petitioner is granted
a period of two months to deposit the 20% of the compensation
amount i.e. on or before 07.03.2022. It is made clear that no
m
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.