2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78841
MADRAS HIGH COURT
R.SATHIYAMURTHI, AGED 75 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
V.DEVRAJAN – Respondent
CRL OP 16726/2018
['M/S C V SHYAM SUNDER', '', 'R PARAMASIVAM', 'P RAMESH', 'N SENTHILKUMAR', 'C S DHANASEKARAN', '', 'G MOORTHI COUNSEL']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 18.04.2022
DELIVERED ON : 27.05.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.16726 of 2018
and
Crl.M.P.No.8625 fo 2018
R.Sathiyamurthi
S/o. Late T.V.Ramasubbaiyer
... Petitioner/Accused
Versus
V.Devrajan
... Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482
Cr.P.C. praying to call for the proceedings under C.C.No.14 of
2018 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court Court No.VI,
Coimbatore and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Senthilkumar
For Respondent : Mr.C.S.Dhanasekaran
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the
proceedings in C.C.No.14 of 2018 on the file of Judicial
Magistrate Court No.VI, Coimbatore.
2. The petitioner, who is facing trial on a private
complaint filed by the respondent for the offence under Section
74(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Childrens)
Act, 2015 (J.J. Act), has filed this quash petition. The
petitioner had now filed a memo informing the Court that
C.C.No.14 of 2018 was transferred to the Court of the Judicial
Magistrate-II, Coimbatore and renumbered as C.C.No.1396 of 2019
and the same is pending.
3. The gist of the case is that on 01.01.2017 at about
11.00 a.m., when the respondent/complainant was in his house
along with his friends, he came across a report in “Dinamalar”
daily paper, Erode edition dated 18.07.2016. At page No.6 of the
daily, the petitioner published a news item under the caption “9
taJ rpWkpia brf;!; gyhj;fhuk; bra;a Kaw;rp. bjhHpyhsp ifJ”. The respondent
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
was shocked and surprised to see such news published in the
daily newspaper, which has wide circulation in the state of
Tamil Nadu. The victim in this case is a 9 years old child. The
victim's grandmother name had been published. Further, the
victim is a 4th standard school going child and due to the
publication of the such item, the petitioner had committed an
offence under Section 74(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The respondent sent a lawyer
notice on 09.01.2017 to the petitioner calling for explanation
as to why he should not be prosecuted. The legal notice dated
09.01.2017 was received by the petitioner on 11.01.2017.
Thereafter, no reply was forthcoming. Hence, a complaint was
lodged on 23.02.2017. Initially, respondent/complainant's sworn,
statement recorded. Thereafter, the respondent side witnesses,
namely, C.W.1-P.Ravindran and C.W.2-P.Suresh were recorded. The
trial Court, satisfying, prima facie case is made out, took the
complaint on file, issued summons to the petitioner, against
which, the petitioner has filed this quash petition.
4. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner
along with his brothers, is running the Tamil daily newspaper
“Dinamalar”. The petitioner is in-charge of the Erode and Salem
editions as its Editor, Printer and Publisher. There are 10
editions of “Dinamalar”. The petitioner had commenced his
journey with the newspaper nearly 50 years ago. He worked as
Assistant to his father, late T.V.Ramasubbiyer and thereafter
rose to the level of Editor. The newspaper got wide circulation
and following, on an average, nearly 300 news items are
published daily. The daily circulation of the newspaper in Tamil
Nadu is about 9 lakh copies per day. In the Erode edition of the
newspaper dated 18.07.2016, a news item was published with
regard to an attempt of molestation of a 9 years old minor girl
and the arrest of a worker. The petitioner submits that the
press report about the sexual assault was released by the
concerned police. Since the victim was of 9 years old minor
girl, it has become a sensational in the locality. Further,
there was an