2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 84620
MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.PALANISAMY, M/A – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY – Respondent
CRL A 722/2017
['M/S M GURUPRASAD', '', 'R SHASE', 'C RAMARAJ', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
Crl.A.No.722 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.14190 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on :03.11.2022
Pronounced on
:11.11.2022
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Crl.A.No.722 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.14190 of 2017
K.Palanisamy
.. Appellant
/versus/
State by Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Neyveli Township,
Mantharankuppam Police Station,
Cuddalore District.
Crime No.49 of 2015
.. Respondent
Prayer:
Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of
Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order of conviction imposed in
judgment dated 11.08.2016 made in Spl.S.C.No.28 of 2015 on the file of the
District Magalir Sessions Court, Cuddalore by allowing this Criminal
Appeal.
Page No.1/25
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.722 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.14190 of 2017
For Appellant
:Mr.R.Shase
For Respondent
:Mr.R.Kishore Kumar
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
-----
J U D G M E N T
The Criiminal Appeal is preferred by the sole accused being aggrieved
by the order of conviction dated 11/08/2016 in Spl.S.C 28/2015 on the file
District Magalir Sessions Court, Cuddalore.
2.
The particulars of the offences and the terms of sentence
imposed by the trial court are as under:-
Convicted for the offence
under Sections by the trial
Court
Conviction and sentence imposed by the trial
Court
Section 366-A IPC
Sentenced him to undergo 7 years RI and to pay a fine
of Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo 1 year RI
Section 9 of the Prohibition
of Child Marriage Act, 2006
Sentenced him to undergo 1 year RI
Section 5(1) r/w Section 6
of the Protection of Children
from Sexual Offences Act,
(POCSO Act), 2012
Sentenced to undergo him to 10 years RI and to pay a
fine of Rs.1000/- in default to undergo 1 year RI.
The period of Substantive Sentence ordered to run concurrently. The period
Page No.2/25
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.722 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.14190 of 2017
of imprisonment pending trial ordered to be set off under Section 428 of
Cr.P.C.
3.
The case of the prosecution:
On 03/04/2015 at about 8.00 p.m, the parents of the PW-2(victim
girl) who was about 17 years old leaving her at home went to attend the
Village Ayyanar Temple Festival. When they returned home at about
midnight from the temple festival, they found PW-2 was missing. After
searching her at all probable places found not traceable. The information
gathered in the course of search revealed that the petitioner (Palanisami)
aged about 37 years had kidnapped her with intention to have sex with her.
Hence, police complaint Ex.P-1 was given on 07/04/2015 at about 16.00 hrs
by PW-1,the father of minor girl. Based on the complaint, First Information
Report [Ex.P-9] was registered in Crime No:49/2015 under Section 366-A
IPC. Later, it was altered into Sections 363,365,366 A IPC and Section 5 (l)
r/w Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Page No.3/25
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.722 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.14190 of 2017
and Section 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
4.
The trial Court, on examining the records filed along with the
Final Report, framed charges for the offences under Section 366 A IPC,
Section 9 of Prevention of Child Marriage Act,2 006 and Section 5(l) r/w 6
of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
5.
On appreciating the evidence of PW-1 to PW-12, the
documents marked as Ex.P-1 to Ex.P-13 and the Material Objects M.O-1 to
M.O-9, the trial Court has found the accused guilt of charges under Section
366(A)of IPC, Section 9 of Prevention of Child Marriage Act, 2006 and
Section 5(l) r/w Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
Act, 2012.
6.
The trial Court from the testimony of the witnesses and the
Page No.4/25
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.722 of 2017
and
Crl.M.P.No.14190 of 2017
exhibits, has ascertained the age of PW-2 as 21