MADRAS HIGH COURT
Ravikumar Dhandhania – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax officer – Respondent
WP/21058/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved On
14.12.2021
Pronounced On
08.04.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.No.21058 of 2021
and
W.M.P.Nos.22319 & 22321 of 2021
(Through Video Conferencing)
Ravikumar Dhandhania ... Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer,
Ward I (4) Salem,
Room No.306, 3rd Floor,
New Building, No.3,
Gandhi Road,
Salem - 636 007. ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to
call for the records and to quash the impugned order referenced
No.C.No.9503(1)/2018-19/PCIT/SLM dated 14.02.2019 passed by the
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax , Salem as the same is
arbitrary and devoid of merit and to direct the respondent to
waive off sum of Rs.28,61,596/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs Sixty
One Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety Six only) towards interest
due on tax under Section 220(2) for the assessment year 2007-
2008.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Lakshmi Ratan
For Respondent : Mr.A.N.R.Jayapratap
Junior Standing Counsel
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and to quash
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the impugned order dated 14.02.2019 bearing reference
C.No.9503(1)/2018-19/PCIT/SLM
passed
by
the
Principal
Commissioner of Income Tax, Salem and to direct the respondent
to waive off a sum of Rs.28,61,596/- towards interest due on
tax under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the
Assessment Year 2007-2008.
2. The petitioner had filed the return on 05.03.2009 for the
Assessment Year 2007-2008 by admitting an income of
Rs.1,57,410/-. Thereafter, the petitioner appears to have
informed the Income Tax Officer that there was an inadvertent
mistake in the return and therefore, the taxable income was to
be recomputed as Rs.3,20,00,000/-, by which time, the time for
filing revised return under Section 139 of the Income Tax Act,
1961 had expired.
3. Thereafter, the petitioner was issued with a notice dated
31.03.2014 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, pursuant to
which, the petitioner filed revised return, wherein, the
aforesaid amount of Rs.3,20,00,000/- was included into
taxable income of the petitioner. The scrutiny was completed.
Eventually, the Assessment Order was passed by the respondent
Assessing Officer on 30.01.2015, wherein, the interest under
Sections 234A, 234B & 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the
belated payment of tax due on the revised return filed by the
petitioner was demanded. The details of the tax assessed by the
respondent are as under:-
Income originally returned
: Rs. 1,57,410/-
Income returned as per revised return: Rs.3,21,57,410/-
Income assessed
: Rs.3,21,57,410/-
Tax payable
: Rs. 95,97,223/-
Add: Surcharge @ 10%
: Rs. 9,59,722/-
Education Cess @ 2% : Rs. 2,11,139/-
Tax payable
: Rs.1,07,68,084/-
Less:
Advance Tax paid
: Rs. 5,000/-
Tax payable
: Rs.1,07,63,084/-
Add: Interest u/s 234A
: Rs. 23,67,860/-
Interest u/s 234B
: Rs.1,01,17,220/-
Interest u/s 234C
: Rs. 196/-
----------------------
Tax payable
: Rs.2,32,48,360/-
Less : Self assessment tax paid
: Rs.1,07,63,080/-
----------------------
Balance tax payable
: Rs.1,24,85,280
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The petitioner was also issued with a Demand Notice dated
30.01.2015 under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
wherein, the petitioner was called upon to pay a sum of
Rs.1,24,85,280/-. It appears that the petitioner had approached
the competent authority, namely, Chief Commissioner of Income,
Trichy for waiver of int
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.