2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 96916
MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.RAMESH(DIED)1.SARITHA, – Appellant
Versus
P.KALIYAMMAL – Respondent
CMA 2181 2021
C.M.A.No.2181 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on
16.03.2023
Pronounced on
06.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN
THILAKAVADI,J.
C.M.A.No.2181 of 2021
P.Ramesh (Died)
1. Saritha
2. Minor Gowsik
3. Minor Sundaresan
(Minors rep. By their next friend
Guradian/Mother/Saritha)
4.Perumal
…Appellants
Vs.
1.P.Kaliyammal
2.The Divisional Manager,
Oriental Insurance Company Limited,
KVA Complex, 90-A, Thuraiyur Raod,
Page 1 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2181 of 2021
Namakkal
…Respondents
Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of
Motor Vehicles Act,1988, against the award dated 06.02.2020 made in
M.C.O.P.No.58 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
(Chief Judicial Magistrate) Namakkal.
For Appellant
: Mr.M.Lokesh
For R1
: ex-parte
For R2
: Mr. K.Vinod
for M/s.Elveera Ravindran
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.)
The appellant has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as against the
award dated 06.02.2020 made in M.C.O.P.No.58 of 2015 on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate)Namakkal.
Page 2 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2181 of 2021
2.Aggrieved by the insufficiency of compensation awarded by the Tribunal,
the claimants have brought forth the above said civil miscellaneous appeal.
3.In the impugned award the Tribunal directed the respondents to pay a sum
of Rs.1,74,300/- as compensation together with an interest at the rate of 7.5% per
annum from the date of claim till realization and costs for the injuries sustained by
the 1st petitioner-P.Ramesh who met with an accident on 02.12.2014 at about 2.
p.m.
4.The facts of the case is that on 02.12.2014 at about 2.p.m the 1st petitioner-
Ramesh was travelling as a passenger in the bus bearing Reg. No. TN-28-P-7330
to Sabarimala. In the Erumeli to pamba road when the bus was nearing the south of
village, the driver of the bus drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner due
to which the bus was capcized and caused the accident. In the said accident, the 1st
petitioner-Ramesh sustained multiple injuries all over his body and was
immediately taken to MCH Hospital, Kottayam and from there he was shifted to
Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore for further treatment. The right leg of the 1st
Page 3 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2181 of 2021
petitioner was amputated. The Erumalai police registered a case in Crime No.983
of 2014 against the driver of the bus under Section 279, 337, 338 IPC. The 1st
petitioner-Ramesh at the time of the accident was aged about 27 years, painter by
profession and was earning Rs.15,000/- per month. Due to the accident, he was
unable to do any work as before. During the pendency of the claim, the 1st
petitioner-Ramesh died on 31.03.2015 leaving behind petitioners 2 to 5 as his legal
heirs, not attributed to the injuries suffered by the accident. Based on the above
contention, the petitioners 2 to 5 assessed the damages at Rs.20,00,000/- and
prayed for an award against the respondents. The 1st and 2nd respondents being the
owner and insurer of the offending vehicle respectively as on date of the accident
and hence, they were jointly and severaly liable to pay compensation to the
petitioners.
5.In order to prove their case, the petitioners have examined P.W.1 to P.W.3
and relied on 18 documents marked as Ex.P.1 to P.18. The claim of the petitioners
was resisted by the 2nd respondent in their counter statement stating that the
accident was not due to the negligence of the driver of the bus. The petition does
not disclose the cause of death of the 1st petitioner and in fact the 1st petitioner died
Page 4 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2181 of 2021
after few months from the date of accid