SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 102584

MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. Bala – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Panchayat – Respondent
WA 3044 2023



W.A.No.3044 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.11.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

W.A.No.3044 of 2023

M.Bala

..

Appellant

Vs.

1. The Inspector of Panchayat /

The District Collector

Thiruvannamalai District

Thiruvannamalai – 606 604.

2. The Assistant Director of Panchayat (Panchayats)

Thiruvannamalai District

Thiruvannamalai – 606 604.

3. The Block Development Officer

Vengaikkal Panchayat

Thiruvannamalai Union

Thiruvannamalai District – 606 604.

4. The Tahsildar

Thiruvannamalai Taluk Office

Thiruvannamalai – 606 601.

5. T.Shanthi

..

Respondents

Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the

order dated 04.10.2023 in W.P.No.25778 of 2023.

Page 1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A.No.3044 of 2023

For the Appellant

: Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi

for Mr.P.Pandiyaraj

For the Respondents

: Mr.P.Muthukumar

State Government Pleader

for R1 to R4

Mr.Richardson Wilson

for Mr.K.Chandru

for R5

JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

Heard Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi, learned counsel appearing for

Mr.P.Pandiyaraj, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr.P.Muthukumar,

learned State Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 4 and

Mr.Richardson Wilson, learned counsel appearing for Mr.K.Chandru,

learned counsel for respondent 5.

2. Learned State Government Pleader submits that the

appellant is already removed as Vice President under notification

dated 01.11.2023. In view of that, the appellant will have to assail

his removal.

Page 2 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A.No.3044 of 2023

3. As the appellant is already removed as Vice President and

that he will have to challenge his removal, we are not entering into

the merits of the appeal. In that event, all contentions of the

respective parties are kept open.

4. The writ appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of. There will

be no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.25213 and 25218

of 2023 are closed.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)

03.11.2023

Index

: Yes/No

Neutral Citation : Yes/No

drm

Page 3 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A.No.3044 of 2023

To

1. The District Collector

Thiruvannamalai District

Thiruvannamalai – 606 604.

2. The Assistant Director of Panchayat (Panchayats)

Thiruvannamalai District

Thiruvannamalai – 606 604.

3. The Block Development Officer

Vengaikkal Panchayat, Thiruvannamalai Union

Thiruvannamalai District – 606 604.

4. The Tahsildar

Thiruvannamalai Taluk Office

Thiruvannamalai – 606 601.

Page 4 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A.No.3044 of 2023

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

(drm)

W.A.No.3044 of 2023

03.11.2023

Page 5 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top