MADRAS HIGH COURT
The Official Liquidator – Appellant
Versus
M/s.Commtel Networks Pvt.Ltd. – Respondent
Comp.A.No.223 of 2018
in C.P.No.255 of 2014
C.SARAVANAN,J.
There is no representation on the behalf of the respondent in this
application. No counter has been filed so far, despite service of notice and
name being printed in the cause list.
2. This application has been filed to direct the respondent/debtor
company to pay a sum of Rs.10,01,129.84 towards entire settlement along with
subsequent interest @ 18% p.a.till the date of final payment and to direct the
respondent to surrender assets in terms of clause (18) the agreement and to
permit the Official Liquidator to meet the cost of this application from the
funds of the company in Provisional Liquidation.
3. In the report dated 13.11.2017 filed by the Official Liquidator, it
has been stated as follows:-
3. That the Official Liquidator submits that the respondent had
entered into 2 Operating Lease Agreement with the
Company in Provisional Liquidation and borrowed money
for the purpose of purchase of Xerox Machine out of which
1st Agreement tenor got over before liquidation.
The details of active agreement as on the date of wind up
order are mentioned below:-
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.