2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 97993
MADRAS HIGH COURT
P.R.Sree Ranjini – Appellant
Versus
The commissioner – Respondent
WP/34757/2022
Unauthorized construction in a common passage obstructing ingress and egress can be subject to demolition.
Headnote:
UNAUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION - DEMOLITION - COMMON PASSAGE - [The court directed the respondents to inspect the property in question within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and 3rd respondent and if there any unauthorized shed is put up in the common pathway, take immediate action in accordance with law against the 3rd respondent and others, if any.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to demolish the unauthorized construction of a shed put up in the common passage running from east to west on the northern side, obstructing the ingress and egress to his land.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the respondents to inspect the property in question within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner and 3rd respondent and if there any unauthorized shed is put up in the common pathway, take immediate action in accordance with law against the 3rd respondent and others, if any.
Issues: Whether the unauthorized construction of a shed in the common passage obstructed the ingress and egress to the petitioner's land?
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that if there is any unauthorized shed put up in the common pathway, the respondents should take immediate action in accordance with law against the 3rd respondent and others, if any.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition with directions to the respondents to inspect the property in question and take appropriate action if any unauthorized construction is found.
W.P.No.34757 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
and
THE HONOURABLE
MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
W.P.No.34757 of 2022
P.R.Sree Ranjini
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Chennai Greater City Corporation,
Ripon Building, Chennai.
2.Executive Engineer,
Chennai Corporation (Zone-6),
Ayanavaram,
Chennai – 600 023.
3.Karunamuruthi
.. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
Respondents 1 & 2 to demolish the unauthorized construction of shed put
up in the common passage running from the east to west on the northern
side obstructing the ingress and egress to the petitioner's land situated at
Door No.104/152, Meetu Street, comprised in Paimash No.980 T.S.No.84
in Block No.28 within Ayanavaram Village, Chennai – 600 023 based on
the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2022 to the respondents 1 & 2.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.34757 of 2022
For Petitioner
: Mr.V.Balakrishnan
for Ms.D.Sri Devi
For RR 1 & 2
: Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu
Standing Counsel
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was delivered by V.M.VELUMANI,J.)
The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition for a
direction to the respondents 1 & 2 to demolish the unauthorized
construction of shed put up in the common passage running from east to
west on the northern side, obstructing the ingress and egress to his land
situated at Door No.104/152, Mettu Street, comprised in Paimash
No.980, T.S.No.84 in Block No.28 within Ayanavaram Village, Chennai –
600 023, based on his representation dated 14.12.2022 to the
respondents 1 & 2.
2.By consent of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well
as Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for the
respondents 1 & 2, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the
admission stage itself.
3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as
the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 & 2 and
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.34757 of 2022
perused the entire materials on record.
4.According to petitioner, he is the owner of the property situated
in Paimash No.980, T.S.No.84 in Block No.28, within Ayanavaram
Village, Chennai to an extent of 2475 sq.ft. He having purchased the
same from one R.Natarajan Naicker, by way of sale deed dated
11.12.2004 along with a common pathway to reach the said property.
While so, the 3rd respondent along with grand daughter of the vendor had
constructed a shed in the common pathway obstructing the ingress and
egress of the petitioner's property. The 3rd respondent constructed the
shed in the common pathway without obtaining any planning permission
and approval from the respondents 1 & 2. Hence, the petitioner has sent a
representation dated 14.12.2022 to the respondents 1 & 2. Since the
respondents 1 & 2 have not taken any action on the said representation,
the petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition.
5.Considering the nature of relief sought for by the petitioner and
the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the
respondents 1 & 2 are directed to inspect the property in question within
a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order,
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.34757 of 2022
after issuing notice to the petitioner and 3rd respondent and if there any
unauthorized shed is put up in the common pathway, take immediate
action in accordance with law against the 3rd respondent and others, if
any.
6.With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No
costs.
(V.M.V., J) (R.H., J)
03.01.2023
krk
Index
: Yes / No
Internet
: Yes / No
To
1.The Commissioner,
Chennai Greater City Corporation,
Ripon Bu