MADRAS HIGH COURT
VIJAYARAGAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
1
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under
Section 447, 506(i) of IPC in Cr.No.784 of 2022 on the file of the respondent
police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that regarding a dispute about common
pathway, the defacto complainant filed Civil Suit. Due to which the petitioner
and his brother, threatened the defacto complainant witih dire consequences.
Hence, the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
The petitioner has no specific vengence with the defacto complainant.
Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the
petitioner has trespassed into the property and he threatened the defacto
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
complainant. Hence, he opposed to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, the submission of the
learned Government Advocate (Crl. S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.