SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 92808

MADRAS HIGH COURT
VIJAYARAGAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


1

Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022

Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under

Section 447, 506(i) of IPC in Cr.No.784 of 2022 on the file of the respondent

police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that regarding a dispute about common

pathway, the defacto complainant filed Civil Suit. Due to which the petitioner

and his brother, threatened the defacto complainant witih dire consequences.

Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that

the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

The petitioner has no specific vengence with the defacto complainant.

Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the

petitioner has trespassed into the property and he threatened the defacto

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2

Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022

complainant. Hence, he opposed to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances, the submission of the

learned Government Advocate (Crl. S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top