2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 92808
MADRAS HIGH COURT
VIJAYARAGAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL OP/32391/2022
An accused is entitled to anticipatory bail if the court is satisfied that the accused is not likely to commit any offence while on bail and will not abscond.
Headnote:
ANTICIPATORY BAIL - SECTION 447, 506(I) OF IPC - TRESPASSING AND THREATENING - ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 447, 506(i) of IPC for trespassing into the property and threatening the defacto complainant due to a dispute about a common pathway.
Finding of the Court:
The court, after considering the facts and circumstances, is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail for the alleged offences under Section 447, 506(i) of IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail subject to certain conditions, including executing a bond, reporting to the police regularly, not tampering with evidence or witnesses, and not absconding.
Final Decision: The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail upon executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties each for a like sum, and subject to certain conditions.
1
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under
Section 447, 506(i) of IPC in Cr.No.784 of 2022 on the file of the respondent
police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that regarding a dispute about common
pathway, the defacto complainant filed Civil Suit. Due to which the petitioner
and his brother, threatened the defacto complainant witih dire consequences.
Hence, the case.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that
the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.
The petitioner has no specific vengence with the defacto complainant.
Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the
petitioner has trespassed into the property and he threatened the defacto
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
complainant. Hence, he opposed to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, the submission of the
learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) this Court is inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the
event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the
date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate
No.I, Kanchipuram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond
for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two
sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the
police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned
Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left
thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a
copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every
Wednesday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of eight weeks and thereafter, as
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
and when required for interrogation;
(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during
investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/
Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in
accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the
petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as
laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala
[(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered
under Section 229-A IPC.
03.01.2023
vsn
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
vsn
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
Crl.O.P.No.32391 of 2022
03.01.2023
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis