2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 95295
MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.KESAVAN, (AGED-37) – Appellant
Versus
V.MURUGESAN – Respondent
CRL RC 1443 2017
Crl RC .No.1443 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.02.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl RC No.1443 of 2017
M.Kesavan
... Petitioner/Appellant /Accused
Vs.
V.Murugesan
...Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
Prayer : Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, to call for the records of the case in C.A.No.4
of 2017 on the file of Principal Session Judge at Namakkal and
examine the legality and propriety of the proceedings and setaside
the conviction dated 01.08.2017 which confirms the conviction
imposed in judgement dated 29.12.2016 made in C.C.No.170 of
2013 on the file of Judicial Magistrate I, Namakkal and direct that
the petitioner may be set at liberty and acquitting him of the
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl RC .No.1443 of 2017
charges.
For Petitioner
: No appearance
For Respondent : Mr.R.Nalliyappan
O R D E R
Pursuant to the earlier order passed by this Court, the
petitioner was produced before this Court by the Special Sub-
Inspector of Police, Rasipuram Police station, Namakkal District.
2.
The petitioner and the respondent were present before
this Court. This Court enquired both the petitioner and the
respondent as to whether the matter has been compromised
between them and they stated that the matter has been
compromised and the petitioner has paid the cheque amount to the
respondent. The compromise memo to that effect signed by the
petitioner and the respondent has also been filed before this Court.
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl RC .No.1443 of 2017
3.
The petitioner was convicted for an offence under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and was sentenced to
undergo nine months simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of
Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo three months simple
imprisonment. This conviction and sentence was also confirmed by
the Appellate Court in Crl A No.4 of 2017. Aggrieved by the same,
the present Criminal Revision Petition has been filed before this
Court.
4.
During the pendency of this Criminal Revision Petition,
the parties have reached compromise and a compromise memo has
also been filed before this Court. Both the petitioner and the
respondent categorically stated that the dispute has been amicably
settled and that the offence can be compounded.
5.
In the light of the above, this Court in exercise of its
3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl RC .No.1443 of 2017
power and jurisdiction under Section 147 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881, compounds the offence in favour of the
petitioner and accordingly, the judgement and order passed by both
the Court below are hereby setaside.
6.
This Criminal Revision Petition is allowed in the above
terms. No costs.
23.02.2023
Internet
: Yes
Index
: Yes
Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order
rka
To
1. The Principal Session Judge at Namakkal
2. The Judicial Magistrate I, Namakkal
4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl RC .No.1443 of 2017
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
rka
Crl RC No.1443 of 2017
23.02.2023
5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis