2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 95296
MADRAS HIGH COURT
PAUL PONMONY – Appellant
Versus
K. NATARAJAN – Respondent
CMA 1471 2017
C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017
1.Paul Ponmony
2.Anil Ponmony
... Appellants in both the cases
Vs.
1.K.Natarajan
... Respondent in both the cases
2.Ajay Ponmony
(Given up)
COMMON PRAYER: Appeal filed under Or.XLIII Clause 1 and Sub
Clause (r) of CPC against the order and decree made in I.A.No.4 of 2016 and
110 of 2015 in O.S.No.76 of 2015 dated 21.12.2016 on the file of the IV
Additional District Court, Ponneri.
For Appellants
: Mr.N.Damodaran
For Respondents
: Mr.P.Sivamani for R1
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017
COMMON JUDGMENT
These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are preferred against the judgment
and decree in I.A.Nos.4 of 2016 and 110 of 2015 in O.S.No.76 of 2015 dated
21.12.2016 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Ponneri.
2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that suit itself came to be
dismissed as early as on 27.09.2021. It is relevant to note that the
adjudication preceding the dismissal of the suit runs as follows:
“Plaintiff called absent. No representation.
Suit is in the year of 2015. Matter is posted for Trial
from 17.04.2017. No steps Taken. Hence suit is
dismissed for default.”
3. However, Mr.P.Sivamani, learned counsel appearing for the 1st
respondent is unable to confirm the said fact. However, it is seen that daily
status available in E-courts website clearly evidences the fact the suit has
been dismissed way back on 27.09.2021 and hence nothing survives for
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017
adjudication in the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeals since they arise only
out of Interlocutory Applications. However, liberty is granted to the
appellants in the event they deem it fit to revive the Civil Miscellaneous
Appeals consequent upon the suit being restored to file. However, it is made
clear that liberty granted here shall not be cited as a reason for the Trial Court
while considering the restoration application or delay application on merits.
4. With the above observations, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are
closed. No costs.
23.02.2023.
Internet:Yes
Index:Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
kpr
To
1.The IV Additional District Judge
Ponneri.
2.The Section Officer
V.R.Section
High Court, Madras
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017
P.B.BALAJI, J.,
kpr
C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017
23.02.2023
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis