SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 95296

MADRAS HIGH COURT
PAUL PONMONY – Appellant
Versus
K. NATARAJAN – Respondent
CMA 1471 2017



C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017

1.Paul Ponmony

2.Anil Ponmony

... Appellants in both the cases

Vs.

1.K.Natarajan

... Respondent in both the cases

2.Ajay Ponmony

(Given up)

COMMON PRAYER: Appeal filed under Or.XLIII Clause 1 and Sub

Clause (r) of CPC against the order and decree made in I.A.No.4 of 2016 and

110 of 2015 in O.S.No.76 of 2015 dated 21.12.2016 on the file of the IV

Additional District Court, Ponneri.

For Appellants

: Mr.N.Damodaran

For Respondents

: Mr.P.Sivamani for R1

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017

COMMON JUDGMENT

These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are preferred against the judgment

and decree in I.A.Nos.4 of 2016 and 110 of 2015 in O.S.No.76 of 2015 dated

21.12.2016 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Ponneri.

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that suit itself came to be

dismissed as early as on 27.09.2021. It is relevant to note that the

adjudication preceding the dismissal of the suit runs as follows:

“Plaintiff called absent. No representation.

Suit is in the year of 2015. Matter is posted for Trial

from 17.04.2017. No steps Taken. Hence suit is

dismissed for default.”

3. However, Mr.P.Sivamani, learned counsel appearing for the 1st

respondent is unable to confirm the said fact. However, it is seen that daily

status available in E-courts website clearly evidences the fact the suit has

been dismissed way back on 27.09.2021 and hence nothing survives for

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017

adjudication in the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeals since they arise only

out of Interlocutory Applications. However, liberty is granted to the

appellants in the event they deem it fit to revive the Civil Miscellaneous

Appeals consequent upon the suit being restored to file. However, it is made

clear that liberty granted here shall not be cited as a reason for the Trial Court

while considering the restoration application or delay application on merits.

4. With the above observations, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are

closed. No costs.

23.02.2023.

Internet:Yes

Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation:Yes/No

kpr

To

1.The IV Additional District Judge

Ponneri.

2.The Section Officer

V.R.Section

High Court, Madras

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017

P.B.BALAJI, J.,

kpr

C.M.A.Nos.1471 and 1472 of 2017

23.02.2023

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top