SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 92003

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dr.G.V.Varadarajulu @ Sekar – Appellant
Versus
R.Muthappa – Respondent


OA.No.817 of 2022

OA.No.817 of 2022

OA.No.871 of 2023

in

C.S.No.273 of 2022

Reserved on

16.06.2023

Delivered on

26.06.2023

K.KUMARESH BABU,J.

Heard Mr.K.Ravi, learned Senior counsel appearing for

M/s.Rugan & Arya for the applicants and Mr.P.Anandan, learned

counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. In these applications the plaintiffs have sought for interim

injunction from interfering with his possession without due process of

law and for a direction to the concerned Inspector of Police to offer

adequate protection to the plaintiff and the suit schedule properties B, C,

D & E in particular. The plaintiff had impleaded a known party as the

first defendant and also seeks a John Doe order.

3. When the application for injunction was taken, this court had

granted an injunction for a period of three weeks and also permitted the

applicant to take private notice and also to effect paper publications.

When the applications were taken for further hearing, an advocate had

entered appearance on behalf of the first respondent/defendant and

1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

OA.No.817 of 2022

sought time to file his Vakalath and counter in the applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top