SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.SATHISHKUMAR, AGED 33 YEARS – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP. BY ITS – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S DR G KRISHNAMURTHY', '', 'E VENUGOPAL', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved On

:

10.12.2019

Pronounced On

: 13.01.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

Criminal Appeal No.133 of 2018

B.Sathishkumar

...Appellant/Accused

..Vs..

State represented by its;

The Inspector of Police

H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station, (Crime)

Chennai-600 081

...Respondent/Complainant

Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, against the Judgment of conviction and

sentence dated 14.02.2018 made in S.C.No.85 of 2014 by the

learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai (Mahalir

Needhimandram, Chennai).

For Appellant : Dr.G.Krishnamurthy

For Respondents : Ms.M.Prabhavathi (Crl.side)

Additional Public Prosecutor

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of this Court was delivered by R.PONGIAPPAN,J)

The Appellant herein is the sole accused in S.C.No.85/2014

on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chennai. He

stood charged for the

offences under Sections 449, 302 and 392 I.P.C. By Judgment

dated

14.02.2008,

the

Trial

Court

convicted

the

appellant/accused and awarded sentence as follows:

S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top