SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.PRIYADARSINI – Appellant
Versus
M.KUMARESH – Respondent


CRP.(PD).No. 655 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Orders Reserved on : 08.10.2020

Pronounced on : 14.12.2020

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

CRP.(PD).No. 655 of 2020

and

C.M.P.No. 3383 of 2020

Mrs. A. Priyadarsini

... Petitioner

Versus

Mr. M. Kumaresh

... Respondent

Prayer:

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution

of India, to set aside the impugned order dated 23.01.2020 passed in

O.P.No.2552 of 2016 on the file of III Additional Judge, Family Court,

Chennai, as unsustainable, irrational, against law, facts and equity

and reject the Exhibit-P9 (CD) filed through PW2 by allowing the

above Civil Revision Petition.

For petitioner

: Mr. OM.Prakash (SC)

Asst. by Mr. P.Elayarajkumar

For Respondents : Mr. S.S. Karthikeyan

1 of 10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

CRP.(PD).No. 655 of 2020

ORDER

The revision petitioner is the respondent in the H.M.O.P.

No.2552 of 2016.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision

petitioner/wife under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to reject

the Exhibit-P9 (CD) filed through PW2 during the trial of the

H.M.O.P.No.2552 of 2016 on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top