SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.SENGOTTAIYAN – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S S MANI', '', 'T SELLAPANDIAN', 'V MANOHARAN', 'I BATTA WITH PETITION DUE REG', '', 'R IN WP N/M', 'R STRIKEOFF VIDE COURT ORDER DT']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.11.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

W.P.No. 26116 of 2004

and WPMP.No.31733 of 2004

1.S.Sengottaiyan

2.M.Gnanavel

3.T.S.Venugopal

..Petitioner

Vs

Managing Director,

Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation

(Coimbature Divn.I)Ltd.,

Coimbatore-43.

..Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution

of India for writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent to

recover the Gratuity amount already paid, from the Petitioners

which were settled getting resignation in the cadre of Assistant

and to credit to the Gratuity account in the cadre of Junior

Superintendent/Welfare Inspector, and to confer all the

consequential benefits of settlement under Section 12(3) of the

Industrial Disputes Act entered in 1989 and 1998 by giving

weightage to the service.

For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Ganeshan

For M/s. S.Mani

For Respondents:

No Appearance

*****

O R D E R

Brief facts of the case is that the 1st Petioner had joined

as Conductor in Cheran Transport Corporation, redesignated as

Clerk, further redesignated as Junior Assistant. The 2nd & 3rd

Petitioners joined as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top