S.SENGOTTAIYAN – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR – Respondent
WP 26116/2004
['M/S S MANI', '', 'T SELLAPANDIAN', 'V MANOHARAN', 'I BATTA WITH PETITION DUE REG', '', 'R IN WP N/M', 'R STRIKEOFF VIDE COURT ORDER DT']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.11.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.P.No. 26116 of 2004
and WPMP.No.31733 of 2004
1.S.Sengottaiyan
2.M.Gnanavel
3.T.S.Venugopal
..Petitioner
Vs
Managing Director,
Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation
(Coimbature Divn.I)Ltd.,
Coimbatore-43.
..Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution
of India for writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent to
recover the Gratuity amount already paid, from the Petitioners
which were settled getting resignation in the cadre of Assistant
and to credit to the Gratuity account in the cadre of Junior
Superintendent/Welfare Inspector, and to confer all the
consequential benefits of settlement under Section 12(3) of the
Industrial Disputes Act entered in 1989 and 1998 by giving
weightage to the service.
For Petitioner :
Mr.P.Ganeshan
For M/s. S.Mani
For Respondents:
No Appearance
*****
O R D E R
Brief facts of the case is that the 1st Petioner had joined
as Conductor in Cheran Transport Corporation, redesignated as
Clerk, further redesignated as Junior Assistant. The 2nd & 3rd
Petitioners joined as Senior Clerk, redesignated as Junior
Assistant while the petitioners were working as Junior Assistant
in the erstwhile undivided Cheran Transport Corporation, they
were promoted as Assistant. Cheran Transport Corporation
underwent bifurcation and Jeeva Transport Corporation was formed
due to expansion of growth. When the Cheran Transport
Corporation was divided due to administrative extigencies, a
number of new posts were created. Options were asked for from
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the employees as to whether they want to remain in Cheran
Transport or to go to Jeeva Transport. According to the options
exercised, the personal division also took place. As a result of
the same, a number of posts particularly in the cadre of Junior
Superintendent became vacant. The Feeder Category for the post
of Junior Superintendent is Senior Assistant whereas all the
petitioners herein were only working as Assistant. As there were
a number of vacancies, the management did not want to go to open
market as there may not be sufficient hands with experience,
particularly when the corporation was in the infant state.
Considering maintenance, administration, development and growth,
the management promoted the Junior Superintendent, who were
working as Assistant bypassing intermediary post.
2. The Petitioners were asked to give resignation in the
post of Junior Superintendent/Welfare Inspector. The Petitioners
resigned on the Afternoon and joined in the new post of Junior
Superintendent/Welfare Inspector in the Forenoon, the very next
day, details of which are as follows:
Date of resignation
in the post
Assistant
Date of joining in
the post of Junior
Superintendent/Welfa
re Inspector
1st Petitioner
15.9.1981 AN
16.9.1981 FN
2nd Petitioner
30.6.1981 AN
01.7.1981 FN
3rd Petitioner
15.9.1981 AN
16.9.1981 FN
3. Thus, there were no break. In fact, in the order of
promotion itself, the management made it clear that if no
resignation is submitted, it will be presumed that the
petitioners did not accept and the promotion given will be
cancelled. So, there is no break in service and they have been
continuously working. Therefore, seeking to give effect to the
Government Order in Letter No. 31910/C1/91-2 Transport
Department, dated 23.09.1991 and consequential benefits under
Section 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, the present writ
petition is filed.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit
that only due to bifurcation, the petitioner was placed to the
Jeeva Transport Corporation, therefore, the service rendered by
the petitioner in Cheran Transport Corporation has to be
considered, but the responden