MADRAS HIGH COURT
Visharada Charitable Trust – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of – Respondent
WP 35825/2016
['M/S P RAMESHKUMAR', '', 'R SIVARAMAN S SRIVIDYA', 'L SEETHARAMAN', 'HASMUKH S SURANA', 'J NARAYANASAMY', '', 'SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL', 'TAKES NOTICE']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.11.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 35825 of 2016
Visharada Charitable Trust,
Represented by its Managing Trustee,
V.K. Lohia,
No. 151, AH Block, Anna Nagar,
Chennai – 600 040.
...Petitioner
-vs-
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,
Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building,
121, Mahathma Gandhi Salai,
Chennai – 600 034.
...Respondent
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, calling for the records of the Respondent in F. No.
Compounding Visharada Charitable Trust/2015-16 dated 29.06.2015
and quash the said order and consequently direct the Respondent
to compound the said offence under Section 279 AB read with
Sections 278 B, 269 UC and 269 UL (2) of the Income Tax Act.
For Petitioner
:
Mr. R.Sivaraman
For Respondent
:
Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan,
Standing Counsel
O R D E R
(through video conference)
Heard Mr. R.Sivaraman, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner
and Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan, Learned Standing Counsel appearing
for the Respondent and perused the materials placed on record,
apart from the pleadings of the parties.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2.
The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Order in
F. No. Compounding/Visharada Charitable Trust/2015-16 dated
29.06.2015 passed by the Respondent under Section 279(2) of the
Income Tax Act. 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for
short) rejecting the request for compounding that had been made
by the Petitioner in the application dated 11.07.2013 made in
that regard. The facts leading to the passing of the impugned
order have been captured, which is extracted below:-
“3.
The applicant trust represented by its Managing
Trustee, Shri V.K.Lohia, was the purchaser of the
property for an aggregate sale consideration of Rs.40
laksh situated at Door No AH151, 3rd Street, Anna
Nagar, Chennai-40, from one M/s. Soffia Software Ltd.
(now renames as Quintegra Solutions P. Ltd.)
represented by its Managing Director, Shri R. Venkata
Subramani who was in turn represented by a power agent,
viz. Shri S.C. Agarwal. As the full value of
consideration exceeded Rs.25 lakhs, in terms of
provisions contained in Chapter XXC of the Income Tax
Act, 1961, both the vendor and the vendee were under
the statutory obligation to furnish Form No.37-I
seeking 'no objection' from the Appropriate Authority.
Based on the information available in the office of the
DIT (Exemptions), Chennai, it was detected that single
property was sold by two split-up sale deeds dated
25.1.2001 and 27.3.2001 in contravention of the
provisions of Chapter XXC of the Act. Therefore, the
Member, Appropriate Authority, Chennai, filed a
criminal complaint against all the aforesaid four
persons for the offences under sec. of sec.269UC/269UL
(2) of the I.T.Act, before the Addl. CMM, EO-I,
Chennai, hereinafter referred to as the trial court in
EOCC No.594 of 2002. The trial court by an order dated
29-04-2010 convicted and sentenced all the four accused
with the sentences of imprisonment and fine as
tabulated herein below:
Sl.N
o.
Name of the accused
Sentence of fine and
imprisonment awarded by
the trial court
a)
M/s Soffia Software
Ltd
Fine of Rs.2,50,000 for
offence u/s 269UC and
Rs.2,50,000 for offence
u/s 269UL(2) r.w.s.276AB
of the IT Act 1961.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
b)
Shri.R.Venkata
Subramani
Fine of Rs.10,000 for
offence u/s 269UC and
Rs.10,000 for offence u/s
269UL(2) r.w.s. 276AB of
the IT Act 1961, with one
year RI.
c)
M/s
Visharada
Charitable Trust
Fine of Rs.2,50,000 for
offence u/s 269UC and
Rs.2,50,000 for offence
u/s 269 UL(2) r.w.s.276AB
of the IT Act 1961.
d)
Shri.V.K.Lohia,
Managing Trustee
Fine of Rs.10,000 for
offence u/s 269U