MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
V.K.Lohia, – Appellant
Versus
Chief Commissioner of – Respondent
WP/35826/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.11.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 35826 of 2016
V.K. Lohia
Managing Trustee: Visharada Charitable Trust
No. 1732, 21st Main Road,
Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040.
...Petitioner
-vs-
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax
Aayakar Bhavan, Main Building,
121, Mahathma Gandhi Salai,
Chennai - 600 034.
...Respondent
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, calling for the records of the Respondent in F.No.
Compounding V.K.Lohia/2015-16 dated 29.06.2015 and quash the
said order and consequently direct the Respondent to compound
the said offence under Section 279 AB read with Sections 278 B,
269 UC and 269 UL (2) of the Income Tax Act.
For Petitioner : Mr. R.Sivaraman
For Respondent :
Mrs. Hema Murali Krishnan
Senior Standing Counsel
O R D E R
(through video conference)
Heard Mr. R.Sivaraman, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner
and Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan, Learned Standing Counsel appearing
for the Respondent and perused the materials placed on record,
apart from the pleadings of the parties.
2.
The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Order in
F. No. Compounding/V.K. Lohia/2015-16 dated 29.06.2015 passed by
the Respondent under Section 279(2) of the Income Tax Act. 1961
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for short) rejecting the
request for compounding that had been made by the Petitioner in
the application dated 11.07.2013 made in that regard. The facts
leading to the passing of the impugned order have been captured
therein, which is extracted below:-
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
“3.
The applicant is the Managing Trustee of M/s.
Visharada Charitable Trust, Chennai which purchased a
property for an aggregate sale consideration of Rs.40
lakhs situated in Door No AH151, 3rd Street, Anna
Nagar, Chennai-40, from one M/s. Soffia Software Ltd.
(now renames as Quintegra Solutions P. Ltd.)
represented by its Managing Director, Shri R. Venkata
Subramani who was in turn represented by a power agent,
viz. Shri S.C. Agarwal. As the full
value of consideration exceeded Rs.25 lakhs, in terms
of provisions contained in Chapter XXC of the Income
Tax Act, 1961, (now repealed), both the vendor and the
vendee were under the statutory obligation to furnish
Form
No.37-I seeking 'no objection' from the
Appropriate Authority. Based on the information
available in the office of the DIT (Exemptions),
Chennai, it was detected that single property was sold
by two split-up sale deeds dated 25.1.2001 and
27.3.2001 of Rs.20 lakhs each by contravening the
provisions of Chapter XXC of the Act. Therefore, the
Member, Appropriate Authority, Chennai, filed a
criminal complaint against all the aforesaid four
persons for the offences under sec. of sec.269UC/269UL
(2) of the I.T.Act, before the Addl. CMM, EO-I,
Chennai, hereinafter referred to as the trial court in
EOCC No.594 of 2002. M/s. Soffia Software Ltd., Shri K.
Venkataramani, M/s. Visharada Charitable Trust and Shri
V.K. Lohia were arrayed as Accused No.1 to 4,
respectively. The trial court by an order dated 29-04-
2010 convicted and sentenced all the four accused with
the sentences of imprisonment and fine as tabulated
herein below:
Sl.N
o.
Name of the accused
Sentence of fine and
imprisonment awarded by
the trial court
a)
M/s Soffia Software
Ltd
Fine of Rs.2,50,000 for
offence u/s 269UC and
Rs.2,50,000 for offence
u/s 269UL(2) r.w.s.276AB
of the IT Act 1961.
b)
Shri.R.Venkata
Subramani
Fine of Rs.10,000 for
offence u/s 269UC and
Rs.10,000 for offence u/s
269UL(2) r.w.s. 276AB of
the IT Act 1961, with one
year RI.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
c)
M/s
Visharada
Charitable Trust
Fine of Rs.2,50,000 for
offence u/s 269UC and