SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
THE STATE REP – Appellant
Versus
G.KASINATHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', 'M/S P VIJENDRAN', '', 'V CHITHRA', 'S RAVI CHANDRAN', 'COUNTER FILED BY THE RESPONDENT']

1

Crl.M.P.No.2127 of 2020

in Crl.A.SR.No.6663 of 2020

M. NIRMAL KUMAR.J,

This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the State, Inspector of Police,

District Crime Branch, Tiruvarur with a delay of 1030 days against the

judgment passed in C.A.No.42 of 2015 by the District and Sessions Court,

Tiruvarur dated 18.01.2017.

2. The petitioner herein /State had registered a case against the

respondent in Crime No.6 of 2007 for offences under Section 420, 464, 465

and 471 of IPC on 02.08.2007. Thereafter on completion of investigation had

filed a charge sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvarur in

C.C.No.914 of 2008. During trial PW1 to PW10 were examined, Ex.P.1 to

Ex.P.25 were marked. On the side of defence no witnesses were examined

and no documents marked. On completion of trial, the trial Court convicted

the respondent for offences under Section 420 of IPC and sentenced to

undergo S.I for a period of one year and shall pay fine of Rs.500/- i/d S.I. for

http://www.judis.nic.in

2

a period of two months and for offence under Section 465 r/w 468 sentenced

to undergo S.I. for a period of one year and shall pay fine of Rs.500 i/d S.I.

for a period of two month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top