SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARUMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
MADHAPPAN – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S P MANI', '', 'M SIVA KUMAR', 'M/S A SUNDARAVADHANAN', '', 'B DYANESWARAN', 'R DIED T/E', 'RR AND - GIVEN UP VIDE EB']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

RESERVED ON: 03.01.2019

PRONOUNCED ON: 25 .02.2019

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

S.A.No.1108 of 2007

&

MP.No.1 of 2007

1.Arumugam

2.Periasamy

3.Vediammal

4.Palaniammal

5.Kandammal

6.Nagammal

7.Eswari

.. Appellants/ defendants 1, 3, 7 to 11

Vs.

1.Madhappan

2.Palanisamy

3.Vellaiammal

4.Nagammal ... Respondents / Respondents / Plaintiffs

2 & 3 , Defendants 4 & 6

(Respondents 3 & 4 are given up in this Second Appeal)

Prayer:- This Memorandum of Second Appeal is filed under Section

100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree

dated 26.04.2006 passed in A.S.No.64 of 2005 on the file of

the Subordinate Court, Mettur confirming the judgment and

decree dated 14.02.2005 passed in O.S.No.211 of 1998 on the

file of the District Munsif Court, Mettur.

For Appellants : Mr.P.Mani

For Respondents : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan for R1

R2

: Died

R3 & 4 : Given up

J U D G M E N T

The appellants herein were the appellants 1,3,7 and 11 in

A.S.No.64 of 2005 on the file of learned Subordinate Judge,

Mettur. This Second Appeal has been filed ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top