SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SRI SAAI LAKSHMI PICTURES – Appellant
Versus
70 M.M. ENTERTAINMENTS PVT.LTD., – Respondent
CS 101 2019



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

CIVIL SUIT No.101 OF 2019

M.Murugan

Proprietor of

M/s.Sri Saai Lakshmi Pictures,

No.152, Pillaiar Koil Street,

Isur, Kancheepuram 603 308,

residing at No.363A,

Bharathidasan 1st Cross,

Kauvery Nagar, Chennai 600 015.

... Plaintiff

Vs.

1.

70 M.M. Entertainments Pvt. Ltd.,

House No.8-2-293/A 281/L,

2nd Floor Road,

No.10C, Jubilee Hills,

Hyderabad, Telangana 500 033.

2.

Gube Cinema Technologies,

Media Company,

No.42, Dr. Ranga Road,

Bhaskarapuram, Mylapore,

Chennai 600 004.

3.

The Regional Officer,

Central Board of Film Certification,

Shastri Bhavan, 35 Haddows Road,

Chennai 600 006.

4.

Shiva Mega Film Producers,

rep. by Mahi V. Raghav,

No.36, 37, Shyamlal Layout,

Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli,

Hyderabad 500 032.

... Defendants

http://www.judis.nic.in

S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.

(aeb)

Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with

Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 13(3)(a) of the

Copy Right Act, 1957, read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957 seeking

permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1, 2 and 4 or his men, agents,

representatives (or) any other person claiming under them from releasing the

film 'Yaathra' in Tamil in any theatres, malls, ect. in Tamil Nadu and other areas

by 8th February 2019 and also publish the trailor of the film in print/electronic

media, e.mail any other electronic communication in the State of Tamil Nadu.

For Plaintiff

:

Mr.K.Balakrishan

J U D G M E N T

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the

Plaintiff sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Suit and he has

also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.

2. In view of the above, the Civil Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

However, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Original

Application No.100 of 2019 is closed.

05.03.2019

Index

:

Yes/No

Speaking Order

:

Yes/No

(aeb)

Note to Registry:

The Original documents filed by the Plaintiff shall be returned to the learned

counsel for the Plaintiff, on production of certified copy of the documents, if

the same are not available in the typed set of papers.

C.S.No.101 of 2019

http://www.judis.nic.in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top