SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SOUNDARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYALAKSHMI – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

C.R.P.(PD).No.4730 of 2014

and

M.P.No.1 of 2014

1.Soundarajan

2.Sekar

.. Petitioners

vs.

1.Vijayalakshmi

2.Santhi

3.Jayanthi

4.Susila Jenifer

5.Andal

.. Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India, against the order and decretal order dated 17.07.2014 made in

I.A.No.126 of 2013 in O.S.No.23 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional District

Court, Puducherry.

For Petitioners

: Mrs.V.Srimathi

For Respondents

: Mr.B.Vijay

O R D E R

The petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No.23 of 2008 before the III

Additional District Judge, Pondicherry. The respondents had filed the suit for

partition of the suit Schedule properties. In the said suit, the petitioner’s had

http://www.judis.nic.in

2

also filed their written statement on 14.10.2008. It appears that the suit was

decreed ex parte and thereafter the said order was set aside.

2. At that stage the petitioners sought to file additional

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top