MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.CHANDRA MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
PRANITHA – Respondent
CRL RC 325 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.04.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.R.C.No.325 of 2019
K.Chandra Mohan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Pranitha
Rep. by her mother
S.Jothi
.. Respondent
Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401
Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to the
order passed by the Principal Family Court, Chennai in
MP.No.1072/2018 in MC.No.209/2018 dated 09.02.2018 and set
aside the same. And consequently fix the resonable interim
maintance considering the income of the Petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Senthilkumar
For Respondent : Mr.D.Baskar
***
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision has been filed to call for the
records pertaining to the order passed by the Principal
Family Court, Chennai in MP.No.1072/2018 in MC.No.209/2018
dated 09.02.2018 and set aside the same.
2. The minor child filed the petition against her father
seeking maintenance. While the maintenance case is pending
before the Family Curt, Chennai in MC.No.209 of 2018, the
minor child filed the petition for interim maintenance in
MP.No.1072 of 2018. The learned Family Court Judge, Chennai
considered that there is no source to maintain herself and
awarded a sum of Rs.2,500/- per month towards interim
maintenance, as against the said order, the father filed the
present revision before this Court.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision
petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as a
salesman in TASMAC and he is earning a sum of Rs.7,500/- per
month. Since he has to maintain his age old parents, he is
not in a position to pay a sum of Rs.2,500/- per month to the
child.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision
petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent
and also perused the materials on record.
5. The minor child filed the petition through her mother
for maintenance in MC No.209 of 2018 before the Family
Court. Simultaneously, the minor child filed the petition in
MP.No.1072 of 2018 seeking interim maintenance. The
proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C is a summary in nature.
Further, if the person, who is having sufficient means,
neglected or refused to maintain the child, the child is
entitled to get maintenance. In this case, admittedly, the
child did not have any property on its own and does not have
any source to maintain itself and therefore, filed the
petition against her father.
6. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the petitioner is jobless and he has no money
before the Family Court, Chennai, he is admitted that the
petitioner is working as a salesman in TASMAC shop and he is
getting a sum of Rs.7,500/- per month and he is maintaining
his age old parents. No doubt as a dutiful son, he is liable
to maintain his age old parents and at the same time, he is
liable to maintain his minor child as a dutiful father.
7. This Court is of the view that the income and other
means can be decided in MC.No.209 of 2018. Since it is only
an interim order, the petitioner is liable to pay a sum of
Rs.2,500/- per month to the respondent/minor child towards
monthly maintenance. This Court does not find any perversity
in the order passed by the Family Court, Chennai.
8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is
dismissed. However, the parties are at liberty to raise all
their contentions before the Family Court, Chennai in
MC.No.209 of 2018.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kmi
To
1.The Principal Judge,
Family Court, Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.D.Baskar , Advocate SR.No. 33936
Crl.R.C.No.325 of 2019
A.SK(17/09/2019)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/