MADRAS HIGH COURT
P. GIRISH – Appellant
Versus
TAMILNADU GENERATION AND – Respondent
WP 16603/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on: 05.03.2018
Delivered on: 22-03-2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE V. PARTHIBAN
W.P.No.16603 of 2011 &
WMP Nos.1 to 3 of 2011
1 P. GIRISH
2 S. ELAMBARUTHI
3 P.KRISHNAMURTHY
4 C.MAHALINGAM
5 M. AMBROSE
6 N.SUBRAMANI
7 M.SANKER
8 STEPHEN GNANDAS
9 JAIKISHAN
10 J. ANTONY DOSS
VERSUS
1 TAMILNADU GENERATION AND
DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION
REP BY CHAIRMAN,
CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NPKRR MAALIGAI,
144 ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI 2
2 CHIEF ENGINEER/PERSONNEL
TAMILNADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
CORPORATION,
NPKRR MAALIGAI,
144 ANNA SALAI,
CHENNAI 2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
CHENNAI ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE/WEST
TAMILNADU GENERATION AND
DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION,
THIRUMANGALAM CHENNAI 40.
4 P.S.PARTHASARATHI
5 R. RAVISHANKAR
6 N. ALAGAR SAMY
7 R.JAYASANKAR
8 L.RAVIKUMAR
9 M.SRINIVASAN
10 A. SELVARAJ
11 K. RAVICHANDRAN
12 P.SEETHAPATHY
13 M.KARUNAMOORTHY
14 J. BASKARAN
15 M. VEDACHALAM
16 S. SELVARAJ
17 S. DEVADASAN
18 S.GOWRIPATHY
19 P. DESALU
20 N.ACHUTHAN
21 S. SUBRAMANI
22 P. SANKAR
23 K.VAIDHIYANATHAN
24 S. MANOHARAN
25 M. PONNUSAMY
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
26 M.KALAIVANAN
.... RESPONDENTS
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the 3rd
Respondent relating to memo.no.82/ADM.III/AI/F seniority list of
F.M./2010 dated 6.2.2010 and quash the same as illegal,
arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice in so
far the respondents 4 to 26 are shown as seniors to the writ
petitioners and consequently direct the respondent 1 to 3 to
consider the petitioners representations more particularly
representation dated 4.12.2010 read with the Letter
No.012143/1354/G46/G462/2010-2 of the 2nd respondent dated
18.02.2011, recast the seniority of both the petitioners and the
respondents 4 to 26 based on their seniority in the post of
Wireman/Commercial Assistant/Telephone Operator based on the
single channel system viz., A.P.(ch.) No.106, dated 9.4.1996 and
grant all subsequent promotions to the petitioners on that basis
and promote the petitioners to the post of Special Grade Foreman
accordingly before considering the respondents 4 to 26 and grant
all consequential benefits.
For Petitioners :
Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy for
M/s.Row & Reddy
For Respondents:
Mr.P.R.Dilipkumar for R1toR3
Ms.Anna Mathew for R4, 6 to 8,
10 to 21 & 23 to 26
NA for RR5, 9 & 22.
ORDER
The petitioners have come forward with the present Writ
Petition, for the following relief:
"To
issue Writ of Certiorarified
Mandamus, to call for the records from the
3rd
Respondent
relating
to
memo.no.82/ADM.III/AI/F seniority list of
F.M./2010 dated 6.2.2010 and quash the same
as illegal, arbitrary and violative of
principles of natural justice in so far the
respondents 4 to 26 are shown as seniors to
the writ petitioners and consequently direct
the respondent 1 to 3 to consider the
petitioners
representations
more
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
particularly representation dated 4.12.2010
read
with
the
Letter
No.012143/1354/G46/G462/2010-2 of the 2nd
respondent dated 18.02.2011, recast the
seniority of both the petitioners and the
respondents 4 to 26 based on their seniority
in
the
post
of
Wireman/Commercial
Assistant/Telephone Operator based on the
single channel system viz., A.P.(ch.)
No.106, dated 9.4.1996 and grant all
subsequent promotions to the petitioners on
that basis and promote the petitioners to
the post of Special Grade Foreman
accord
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.