MADRAS HIGH COURT
KARUNANIDHI – Appellant
Versus
ARUL – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.08.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE M.S.SATHYANARAYANAN
C.R.P. No.1123 of 2013
Karunanidhi
... Petitioner
Vs.
Arul
... Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 115 of
the Civil Procedure Code against the order and decree dated
07.11.2012 made in I.A.No.309 of 2012 in O.S.No.50 of 2002, on
the file of learned District Munsif, Vanur.
For petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar
For Respondents: Ms.J.Prithvi for
Mr.Kaithamalai Kumaran
ORDER
The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.50 of
2002, on the file of the court of District Munsif, Vanur.
2. The respondent in the present civil revision petition
filed I.A.No.309 of 2012 under section 5 of the Limitation Act
to condone the delay of 1774 days in filing the application to
set aside the order dated 10.08.2007 of dismissal for default of
the suit in O.S.No.50 of 2002. The said order was confirmed by
the final order dated 07.11.2012 on terms and challenging the
illegality of the same, the revision petitioner has come forward
to file the civil revision petition.
3. The respondent / plaintiff fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.