SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
KARUNANIDHI – Appellant
Versus
ARUL – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S D RAVICHANDER', '', 'P SARITHA', 'P DINESH KUMAR', 'M/S KAITHAMALAI KUMARAN', '', 'FOR R']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE M.S.SATHYANARAYANAN

C.R.P. No.1123 of 2013

Karunanidhi

... Petitioner

Vs.

Arul

... Respondent

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 115 of

the Civil Procedure Code against the order and decree dated

07.11.2012 made in I.A.No.309 of 2012 in O.S.No.50 of 2002, on

the file of learned District Munsif, Vanur.

For petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar

For Respondents: Ms.J.Prithvi for

Mr.Kaithamalai Kumaran

ORDER

The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.50 of

2002, on the file of the court of District Munsif, Vanur.

2. The respondent in the present civil revision petition

filed I.A.No.309 of 2012 under section 5 of the Limitation Act

to condone the delay of 1774 days in filing the application to

set aside the order dated 10.08.2007 of dismissal for default of

the suit in O.S.No.50 of 2002. The said order was confirmed by

the final order dated 07.11.2012 on terms and challenging the

illegality of the same, the revision petitioner has come forward

to file the civil revision petition.

3. The respondent / plaintiff fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top