MADRAS HIGH COURT
SYED ZOHAB ALI – Appellant
Versus
D.SARAWATHI – Respondent
CRP 1503 2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated:28.04.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
CRP(PD)No.1503 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.8000 of 2018
1.Syed Zohab Ali
2.Mrs.Hazira liaquat
.. Petitioners
Vs.
Mrs.D.Saraswathi
.. Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.03.2018 made
in M.P.No.319 of 2017 in R.C.A.No.719 of 2017 on the file of the VIII
(in charge IX Judge), Small Causes Court, Chennai.
For Petitioners
:M/s.M.Elumalai
For Respondent
:Mr.S.Stanley John
http://www.judis.nic.in
2
O R D E R
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the
petitioner/plaintiff against the order dated 06.03.2018 made in
M.P.No.319 of 2017 in R.C.A.No.719 of 2017 on the file of the VIII (in
charge IX Judge), Small Causes Court, Chennai.
2. The respondent/landlord filed a petition before the Rent
Controller against the revision petitioner for eviction. Subsequently,
an order of eviction was passed. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed
by the Rent Controller, the revision petitioner has approached the Rent
Control Appellate Authority in RCA.No.719 of 2017.
3. Initially in the sent control appeal in RCA.No.719 of 2017, the
revision petitioner got an interim of stay order. Subsequently, order
of stay was not extended and after enquiry the stay petition was
dismissed on merits. In the meanwhile, the respondent filed an
excution petition to take delivery of the property. Subsequently the
property was taken delivery and E.P. was also closed.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and
the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
http://www.judis.nic.in
3
5. Since the RCA.No.719 of 2017 is pending, admittedly the
respondent has taken delivery of the property, no purpose will be
served, if any order passed in this revision petition. However, it is
made clear that if the petitioner is able to succeed in sent control
appeal, it is open him to get re-delivery of the property in the manner
known to law.
6. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.04.2018
ub
To
The VIII (in charge IX Judge),
Small Causes Court, Chennai.
http://www.judis.nic.in
4
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ub
CRP(PD)No.1503 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.8000 of 2018
28.04.2018
http://www.judis.nic.in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.