THE BRANCH MANAGER – Appellant
Versus
TMT.SELVAM – Respondent
CMA 3882/2008
['M/S S VADIVEL', '', 'A ASHOK KUMAR', 'M MALAR', 'F TERRY CHELLARAJA', 'NOTICE SENT TO R TO TAPAL RETURNED PERSON NOT FOUND R MINOR S GOUTHAM', '', 'PVT NOTICE', 'A O S NOT FILED']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 31.10.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.M.A.NO.3882 of 2008
and
M.P.No.1 of 2008
The Branch Manager,
National Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Branch Office,
Post Box No.23,
88-F, Bye Pass Road,
Dharmapuri Town & District. ... Appellant/2nd Respondent
Vs
1.Selvam
2.Thiagarajan
3.Maruthanayagam
4.Vivega Rani
5.Minor S.Goutham
Represented by his mother S.Saraswathi
... Respondents/ 1st Respondent
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173
of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and
Decree dated 29.11.2007 and made in MACTOP.No.442 of 2006
on the file of the Dharmapuri District Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal at Krishnagiri (Chief Judicial Magistrate
No.2 Court)
For Appellant
: Mr.S.Vadivel
For Respondent No.2 : No appearance
No.1:Set Exparte before tribunal
JUDGMENT
The instant appeal has been filed by the Insurance
Company challenging the Award dated 29.11.2007 passed by
the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial
Magistrate No.2 at Krishnagiri) in MACTOP.No.442 of 2006.
The brief facts leading to the filing of the instant appeal
are as follows:
2. One Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya Gounder
died as a result of an accident that took place on
16.07.2005 caused by a bus bearing registration No.TN29-M-
0988 owned by the fifth respondent and insured with the
Appellant. The accident happened due to the rash and
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
negligent driving by the driver of the bus which dashed
against the TVS50-XL moped bearing registration No.TN23-K-
6091, in which the deceased Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya Gounder
was the rider. Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya Gounder succumbed to
the injuries after taking treatment on 28.07.2005. The
dependents of the deceased Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya Gounder,
who are the respondents 1 to 4 in the instant Appeal
preferred a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
seeking a compensation of Rs.9,00,000/- for the death of
Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya Gounder. The Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal by its Award dated 29.11.2007 in MACTOP.No.442 of
2006 directed the Appellant to pay the respondents 1 to 4 a
sum of Rs.9,00,000/- together with interest at the rate of
7.5% per annum from the date of claim till the date of
realisation.
3. Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by
the Tribunal to the respondents 1 to 4, the instant appeal
has been filed by the Insurance Company.
4. Heard Mr.S.Vadivel, learned counsel for the
appellant. There is no representation on the side of the
respondents. Notice sent to the respondents 1 to 4 was
returned with an endorsement “Person not found”. Since the
appeal pertains to the year 2008 and this Court is going to
confirm the Award, there is no necessity to serve notice on
the respondents 1 to 4.
5. According to the learned counsel for the Appellant,
the instant appeal has been filed questioning the quantum
of compensation alone. According to the learned counsel for
the Appellant, the quantum of compensation awarded by the
Tribunal to the claimants is an excessive compensation. The
learned counsel for the Appellant would contend that the
compensation awarded by the Tribunal towards Transportation
charges, Extra Nourishment Charges, Damages to clothing,
Medical Bills, Funeral Expenses, Love and Affection and
Loss of happiness and pecuniary loss is on the higher side.
6. This Court has examined the impugned Award.
7. The deceased Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya Gounder at the
time of the accident, was doing rice and grain business and
in the claim petition filed by the claimants, they had
disclosed that the deceased was earning a monthly income of
Rs.10,000/- at the time of the accident. The Tribunal
assessed the age of the deceased Vellaiyan @ Vellaiya
Gounder under the impugned Award at 54 years at the time