SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67319

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Appellant
Versus
P.VANITHA – Respondent


COMMON JUDGMENT

(Made by R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.)

These two writ appeals have been preferred by the respondents in WP(MD).No.2489 of 2015 challenging the order of the writ Court dated17.02.2020.

(A)Factual Matrix:

2.One Mrs.P.Vanitha who is an aspirant to the post of Village Assistant for Vengaloor Village, Devakottai Taluk, Sivagangai District had filed the above said writ petition challenging the appointment order issued to one Mrs.Amutha on 02.12.2014 and for a Mandamus to fill up the said post by way of issuing public notification and proceed with the recruitment process.

3.The appointment of Mrs.Amutha was put to challenge primarily on the following grounds:

a)The candidates who have been sponsored through Employment Exchange alone have been taken into consideration in the selection process. No public notification was issued by way of paper publication. This violates Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

b)Even though the writ petitioner has also registered herself before the Employment Exchange, her name was not sponsored on the sole ground that she had passed 8th Standard and therefore, she is overqualified for the said post.

4.The writ Court had allowed the writ petition on the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top